Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Sea Devils / Sea Devils S63 Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 31 32 33 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2025-12-09 09:36:21 (ID: 100195754) Report Abuse | |
|
What data did you feed in for the SOS calls? ELO of opponents?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-09 09:41:15 (ID: 100195755) Report Abuse | |
|
StuartW wrote:
What data did you feed in for the SOS calls? ELO of opponents? Record and PD in S62 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-09 11:36:52 (ID: 100195760) Report Abuse | |
|
Bleakardor wrote:
Reapers predicted record in first season at Sea Devils (S63) - 8-8 I'm hoping to pull off at least one upset and get a winning record, but I expect 8-8 based on rosters alone. We'll see if we can get an upset, or get upset to change this. Have a few tough matches on the schedule, and a few that we are the underdog in but will likely be a close game with a chance to win. I counted two wins and six 50/50 games. Everything above 5-11 is a good season. Welcome to the Sea Devils. Proof me wrong. ![]() |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-09 12:59:42 (ID: 100195762) Report Abuse | |
|
hmpf22 wrote:
Bleakardor wrote:
Reapers predicted record in first season at Sea Devils (S63) - 8-8 I'm hoping to pull off at least one upset and get a winning record, but I expect 8-8 based on rosters alone. We'll see if we can get an upset, or get upset to change this. Have a few tough matches on the schedule, and a few that we are the underdog in but will likely be a close game with a chance to win. I counted two wins and six 50/50 games. Everything above 5-11 is a good season. Welcome to the Sea Devils. Proof me wrong. ![]() Can't deny that. 6-10 feels like My Ceiling this season based on schedule. Then again I thought 4 wins were High last season and I ended up with 6. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-09 15:08:02 (ID: 100195767) Report Abuse | |
|
hmpf22 wrote:
This is a new try of an SOS ranking. It should be wrong. My schedule should be easier than the schedule of e.g. the Reapers, because I could play the Reapers twice but they have to play against the strong Packers instead. So I don't know what chatgpt calculated here but have fun with this. It seems to me sort of a power ranking. 1. London Silverbacks — 0.9170 2. Glasgow Tigers — 0.8949 3. HAMBURG SEA LIONS — 0.8867 4. Constanta Sailors — 0.8766 5. Konjarnik HighTowers — 0.8563 6. St Pauli Packers — 0.8422 7. Sheffield Wednesday — 0.8366 8. Manta Rays — 0.8091 9. Corsairs — 0.7888 10. Bergen Bruisers — 0.7814 11. Wrexham Exiles — 0.7679 12. Northern Storm — 0.7247 13. Colts — 0.7200 14. Texas Reapers — 0.7039 15. Gaylord Zaleaping — 0.6826 16. Social Distance Runners — 0.6750 17. Riga Smokers — 0.6439 18. Terrifying Hamsters — 0.6306 19. Versailles Victors — 0.5950 20. Baltimore Blue Crabs — 0.5785 21. Devon Warriors — 0.5658 22. dERBENT CONVICTS — 0.5402 23. Rome Centvrions — 0.5233 24. PATAGONIA RAPTORS — 0.5077 25. Black Knights — 0.4763 26. Downriver Seals — 0.4328 27. Minnesota Minotaurs — 0.4098 28. Rome Torresina — 0.3876 29. Fuenlabrada Falcons — 0.3601 30. Texas Reapers (duplicate check done, only one entry kept) 31. Badalona Cheetahs — 0.3108 32. Copenhagen Chargers — 0.1569 Where is the Silver Foxes? Is their schedule too hard to be ranked ![]() ![]() |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-09 16:40:10 (ID: 100195771) Report Abuse | |
|
0verpowerd wrote:
hmpf22 wrote:
14. Texas Reapers — 0.7039 30. Texas Reapers (duplicate check done, only one entry kept) Where is the Silver Foxes? Is their schedule too hard to be ranked ![]() ![]() Reapers shot the Silver Foxes, so they can be listed twice (14 & 32) in the table. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-09 17:02:01 (ID: 100195772) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
torakrid wrote:
0verpowerd wrote:
hmpf22 wrote:
...So I don't know what chatgpt calculated here but have fun with this. It seems to me sort of a power ranking. 14. Texas Reapers — 0.7039 30. Texas Reapers (duplicate check done, only one entry kept) Where is the Silver Foxes? Is their schedule too hard to be ranked ![]() ![]() Reapers shot the Silver Foxes, so they can be listed twice (14 & 32) in the table. Plus, it's chatgpt so of course it makes some mistakes ![]() Last edited on 2025-12-09 17:02:38 by 0verpowerd |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-10 00:14:15 (ID: 100195775) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
Using advanced german data regarding Strength of Schedule.
We have made some conclusions. 1. The NC has a slightly higher rating than the AC. 2. Hardest NC Division - NC North 3. Easiest NC Division - NC East 4. Hardest AC Division - AC West 5. Easiest AC Division - AC North Last edited on 2025-12-10 00:14:43 by Stabler12 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-10 13:17:26 (ID: 100195788) Report Abuse | |
|
For years, the food stalls at Lambeau-Millerntor have delighted our fans with all sorts of delicacies from across the Sea Devils region. Unfortunately, we can no longer offer the popular fried weasels. Our supplier has discontinued production.
New on the menu are hamster chips and pulled silver fox. Following their great success last season, sea lion steaks are also back again this year. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-12-11 07:15:17 (ID: 100195821) Report Abuse | |
|
Well fellows is great to see the SD region full of managers for another season.
Now that you also have Bleak here, my time is not great in this period and i barely managed to make some time to make the predictions in Elite. So no predictions this season from me for SD region, as you have a lot of other managers who are doing that already. Have a great season lads. ![]() |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 31 32 33 > >| | |
| Main / Sea Devils / Sea Devils S63 | |



