no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Top Draftees selected. Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
WorpeX
|
posted: 2016-12-22 18:26:58 (ID: 100093951) Report Abuse |
|
medical3072 wrote:
WorpeX wrote:
medical3072 wrote:
19 yo, 3 EXP 50 SPD, 42.8 STR (yellow) 33.7 AGI, 24.4 POS, 28.6 CAT, 20.4 VIS, 28.3 BLO Stickyfingers trait Think he'll be a solid TE for me That dude seems too good to waste as a TE. I'd make him a WR personally Do WR block on running plays? Seems a shame to waste his blocking skills. They do not. But unless you're specifically building your playbook to utilize TEs, they don't get much action in the passing game. A waste of such a great player imo. Plus, TEs don't appear to be a position that benefits from high physical stats. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
spartans11
|
posted: 2016-12-22 18:56:25 (ID: 100093958) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Alexx wrote:
I got a 50-50 guy, 50 STR and 50 SPD (and track star!). At pick #13. So obviously very happy. But a little bit confused where to play him. Any thoughts? Theo Vernon, 23yo, 3,5 * EXP Came into the league as LB: 31 TACK, 31 POS, 25 VIS, 10 A-TOG-. INT 40,8, TW 24,2. Obviously with his STR-SPD you would love him at MLB, but i'm afraid his INT is too low. So currently I'm leaning to CB... OLB he will be a sack machine and still be able to make interceptions Last edited on 2016-12-22 18:56:52 by spartans11 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
amalric7
|
posted: 2016-12-23 11:46:40 (ID: 100094005) Report Abuse |
|
Always nice when you're a NY Giants fan of a certain age, and you pick up a back called Joe Morris.
Okay, he's a FB and he had a different name when he was picked, but when the random name generator throws up something like that you gotta think karma! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2016-12-24 08:05:28 (ID: 100094082) Report Abuse |
|
I wouldn't waste any 50/50 guys at DE. My "best" DE (50 STR, 49.2 SPD, 44 Tackling, 43 Footwork, 40.6 Vision, 38.9 Agility, 39.7 Intelligence, 43.5 Teamwork, 4.5 Experience), doesn't do any better than guys with half his speed. I think the tweaks Pete made have made speed much less important for DE (which is probably reasonable).
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Brewnoe
|
posted: 2016-12-28 05:20:57 (ID: 100094380) Report Abuse |
|
Rock777 wrote:
I wouldn't waste any 50/50 guys at DE. My "best" DE (50 STR, 49.2 SPD, 44 Tackling, 43 Footwork, 40.6 Vision, 38.9 Agility, 39.7 Intelligence, 43.5 Teamwork, 4.5 Experience), doesn't do any better than guys with half his speed. I think the tweaks Pete made have made speed much less important for DE (which is probably reasonable). Would be more interesting if a slow DE could be re-engaged by a fast OT
My picks: rnd 1 / pick 30 - double trait FB (#5 rank) 19yo 46.7(y)/42.7(r) crap (28.4) tw ... blocking back + track star - may be FB of the future, may be xfer market, may get my O running more shot 2/62 double trait FB #2 (#18 rank) 21yo 40.4(nc)/43.3(r) crap exp ... slippery + pass blocker - another  ... ignore a trait and build an OT? ... or put a Gronk on the xfer market ... or make a TE playbook?
3/94 19yo ... 2.5xp guess all the late rounders can't all be my Tom -G.O.A.T- |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Brewnoe
|
posted: 2016-12-28 23:05:43 (ID: 100094466) Report Abuse |
|
WorpeX wrote:
medical3072 wrote:
19 yo, 3 EXP 50 SPD, 42.8 STR (yellow) 33.7 AGI, 24.4 POS, 28.6 CAT, 20.4 VIS, 28.3 BLO Stickyfingers trait Think he'll be a solid TE for me That dude seems too good to waste as a TE. I'd make him a WR personally Except that stickyfingers plays more like ickyfingers ... serious RB/FB potential though |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2016-12-30 20:11:03 (ID: 100094695) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse |
|
Brewnoe wrote:
Would be more interesting if a slow DE could be re-engaged by a fast OT
Well agility makes more sense there. You're not using speed when you're moving laterally, or for your first few steps in any directly really. First few steps is acceleration, which is better captured by agility than speed. Lateral movement is just plain agility. One of the reasons that it makes zero sense that speed is such a big factor in QB sacks, in this game. A general misconception of what speed is. Last edited on 2016-12-30 20:12:41 by Rock777 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Top Draftees selected. | |
