no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Hybrid Player Tag Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2017-03-08 22:26:09 (ID: 100099515) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Jonny Utah wrote:
Really cool idea  might have to think of a negative for this postive to happen though, like increase the OOP, drop a roster spot (down to 69) or hybrid has higher wages?Higher wages is a logical one. If he can do more on the field, he should be paid more. It could also include a bonus for the player paid up front, similar to the bonus you pay to keep a retiring player for an extra year. Maybe it gives a hit to Team Chemistry and Morale, to reflect that it takes time for them to feel comfortable in their new position. Similar to the penalties when changing position as they are now. Last edited on 2017-03-08 22:35:47 by Firenze |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-03-08 23:20:35 (ID: 100099522) Report Abuse |
|
Lamba wrote:
Where's the DT/FB?  I don't have a DT/FB, but I have a DE/RB. He's my fumble returner. He's maxed in all defensive skills, so I trained carrying lol. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-09 07:12:20 (ID: 100099530) Report Abuse | |
|
Firenze wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
Really cool idea might have to think of a negative for this postive to happen though, like increase the OOP, drop a roster spot (down to 69) or hybrid has higher wages?Higher wages is a logical one. If he can do more on the field, he should be paid more. It could also include a bonus for the player paid up front, similar to the bonus you pay to keep a retiring player for an extra year. Maybe it gives a hit to Team Chemistry and Morale, to reflect that it takes time for them to feel comfortable in their new position. Similar to the penalties when changing position as they are now. Sounds good to me |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2017-03-09 10:48:21 (ID: 100099543) Report Abuse |
|
Firenze wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
Really cool idea might have to think of a negative for this postive to happen though, like increase the OOP, drop a roster spot (down to 69) or hybrid has higher wages?Higher wages is a logical one. If he can do more on the field, he should be paid more. It could also include a bonus for the player paid up front, similar to the bonus you pay to keep a retiring player for an extra year. Maybe it gives a hit to Team Chemistry and Morale, to reflect that it takes time for them to feel comfortable in their new position. Similar to the penalties when changing position as they are now. That'd make sense |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2017-03-09 16:27:38 (ID: 100099579) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
I am fine with this suggestion as long as is a limit on how many players.
And does not allow players to play both o and D. I know for me. I would use it for my FB/RB ON D most likely CB/SF So he could back up both positions Last edited on 2017-03-09 16:27:52 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
mikemike778
|
posted: 2017-03-09 18:38:10 (ID: 100099591) Report Abuse |
|
Or ...
Why not have it as a trait (player is capable of being a hybrid). Instead of wage hit, maybe have the cons element is that he gets the lower rated coach of the two positions. Would eliminate any possible exploit. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
oakbark
|
posted: 2017-03-12 08:50:57 (ID: 100099851) Report Abuse |
|
The one area I could see this being an advantage needing balancing is with established more expensive teams being able to employ less as a player could offer depth at two positions say DE/OLB and thus save money by employing less players overall.
That may affect balance in that teams no longer need to dump so many vets as they can afford to keep them around more on their smaller roster Maybe forces the price of these vets up as their value increases These things can be balanced by restrictions on numbers allows etc, it's really just to throw this out there as I hadn't seen it mentioned yet |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Hybrid Player Tag | |
