no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / American Football in real life / Free Agency 2017 Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 7 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2017-03-11 22:54:28 (ID: 100099820) Report Abuse |
|
oakbark wrote:
We probably stink, get the first overall and Durnauld and be treated to 15 years of bland interviews and success.....god I so don't wanna be like the Pats..... haha dont get carried away, still lots of losing to do to finally become.... better?  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Luko1717
|
posted: 2017-03-11 23:04:25 (ID: 100099822) Report Abuse |
|
Rodgers Nelson Adams Montgomery Bennett
Or Brown Bell Ben Bryant ? Bennett takes the offence to a whole new level, yeah 'the catch' was great but Cook isn't nearly as good as Bennett will be, the dude made -G.O.A.T- look like an ok QB  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-03-11 23:24:29 (ID: 100099828) Report Abuse |
|
Brown, Bell, Ben and Bryant
The reason is because 2 of those 4 have the potential of being the best at their positions. Nelson's best years are behind him. Adams has shown' inconsistent hands. You didn't even think to mention Cobb, so that should tell you how much he's fallen off since signing his big deal. Montgomery is going to be locked into a timeshare at RB because they Packers always use a committee approach. Bennett is a much better player than Cook ever was, so he should take away touches from all pass catchers, suppressing value even further. Aaron Rodgers wins. I expect him to continue to put up stellar numbers. IMO, the Packers didn't need to sign Bennett as much as they shouldn't let players like Micah Hyde leave. He was one of the few players consistently available and versatile enough to cover holes in the secondary. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
JbHeng
|
posted: 2017-03-18 23:09:10 (ID: 100100778) Report Abuse |
|
Don't sleep on the fact the Steelers might draft a TE. And get Ladarius Green back maybe. Plus the Steelers kept their OL intact while Green Bay's look weaker. And this is a terrible draft for linemen. The needs of the steelers are easier to fix in that draft than the packers...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
nathanialblood
|
posted: 2017-03-18 23:36:08 (ID: 100100784) Report Abuse |
|
The Raiders............hmmm
Lost S Nate Allen: Signed contract with Miami Dolphins LB Daren Bates: Agreed to terms with the Tennessee Titans (03/10/17 CB DJ Hayden: Signed with the Detroit Lions (03/11/17) WR Andre Holmes: Agreed to terms with the Buffalo Bills (03/18/17) DT Stacy McGee: Signed with the Washington Redskins (03/10/17) RB Latavius Murray: Signed a deal with the Minnesota Vikings (03/16/17) LB Malcolm Smith: Signed five-year deal with the San Francisco 49ers (03/09/17) S Brynden Trawick: Agreed to terms with the Tennessee Titans (03/10/17) T Menelik Watson: Signed three-year contract with the Denver Broncos (03/10/17) Signed Signed unrestricted free agent TE Jared Cook (3/16/2017) Signed unrestricted free agent WR Cordarrelle Patterson (3/13/17) Signed unrestricted free agent OL Marshall Newhouse (03/13/17) The Raiders have lost a LOT of talent. They have 7 picks for this year. I don't know how the Raiders are going to cope with losing that much talent. Ok it wasn't Carr Mack or Cooper. But the Raiders need a team of 53 not 3 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-19 00:58:25 (ID: 100100790) Report Abuse | |
|
That's a lot of players to let go but a logical lot in my eyes. They have three first round picks at reciever, i know that doesn't make a team but that's.pretty good. They finally have a front offfce that knows when to let go so they can re-sign in the future, i'm not at all worried about the Raiders... Other than a move to Vegas, they belong in Oakland!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lamba
|
posted: 2017-03-19 10:20:54 (ID: 100100812) Report Abuse |
|
There's none of those the Raiders let go that raises red flags to me.
DJ Hayden maybe, but as far as I recall (haven't looked it up) he hasn't really played all too well. Raiders will get to PO if healthy.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
JbHeng
|
posted: 2017-03-19 13:46:17 (ID: 100100826) Report Abuse |
|
I am far less concerned about the Raiders free agency than the Packers. The Oline is getting really thin, especially with Rodgers getting older (and Nelson too), and not to mention the fact Montgomery is still transitionning to RB and can't be excpected to achieve miracles... Beware Packers fans, things could get ugly real quick
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
oakbark
|
posted: 2017-03-19 21:09:02 (ID: 100100874) Report Abuse |
|
JbHeng wrote:
I am far less concerned about the Raiders free agency than the Packers. The Oline is getting really thin, especially with Rodgers getting older (and Nelson too), and not to mention the fact Montgomery is still transitionning to RB and can't be excpected to achieve miracles... Beware Packers fans, things could get ugly real quick In the playoff hunt ugly though I feel..... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MonsterT95
|
posted: 2017-06-11 10:17:45 (ID: 100107649) Report Abuse |
|
JbHeng wrote:
I am far less concerned about the Raiders free agency than the Packers. The Oline is getting really thin, especially with Rodgers getting older (and Nelson too), and not to mention the fact Montgomery is still transitionning to RB and can't be excpected to achieve miracles... Beware Packers fans, things could get ugly real quick especially with those dangerous vikings & Lions sqaud ( Detroit looks like the only team with an above-average O-Line in this division) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 7 > >| | |
| Main / American Football in real life / Free Agency 2017 | |
