no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / American Football in real life / Green Bay Packers Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 22 23 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-01-14 17:52:51 (ID: 100135966) Report Abuse |
|
Ha, good one. The wholes in GBs roster are too big to fill within one offseason, that you dont need to worry about Bear's winning division 2019 again.
On the other hand: GB is loaded with 6 picks until rd4 (2in rd1, another 2 in rd4) in the coming draft. One could think that is enough ammunition. True, but they also have to hit the target. Last cpl of years has shown the opposite. If that is done and the new position coaches took over, all these new puzzle pieces must click together. Curious if that should work out in 2019. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-09-06 10:52:08 (ID: 100142792) Report Abuse |
|
Season 100 - Week 1 - GB
The optimist says: "So far, so good." The pessimist adds ", but the run game.". And right so. Green Bay shines with absolute absence of a running game. They accomplished more first downs by penalties than by the run. Total rushing yards in numbers: 47yrds out of 22 attempts (avg 2.1). Pre-season wasnt any different. If GB cant figure out how to effectively open lanes for the runners, they are in trouble. Having an improved defense, wont help to get away with another W next week agianst the Viks. What's your take, cheeseheads, on that opener? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ivo17
|
posted: 2019-09-06 11:07:41 (ID: 100142793) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
260 and 274 yards on offense
That means they are either very good on defense or their offense just sucks... time will tell oh yeah @mücke I wish you no luck at all in the DP game tomorow 
 Last edited on 2019-09-06 11:08:52 by ivo17 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-09-06 11:18:53 (ID: 100142794) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
To be honest, if Trubisky would've been any more competent at almost any point during that game it's a Bears win. The GB offense was basically eradicated, apart from the 47 yard play and the TD right after.
The positives? The GB defense seems better than I can ever remember, though it wasn't really challenged considering they realised it will be a half-field read game pretty fast. 5 sack is a pretty good start nonetheless, and a win is a win. Rodgers didn't get hurt either. Last edited on 2019-09-06 11:19:11 by ChoadW |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sverngolld
|
posted: 2019-09-06 13:09:15 (ID: 100142798) Report Abuse |
|
Chicago's front seven are on the elite level. Rodgers was running for his life, all night. Offense will pick up for them in the future. Chicago's D is tough to beat, yet GB still scored the only TD. Certainly won't be a stellar season for the Pack, but they've still got some resources they haven't tapped yet.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-09-06 23:23:44 (ID: 100142816) Report Abuse |
|
thanks Ivo for wishing well, that's exactly what I need to beat you: No luck
 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2019-10-08 10:36:52 (ID: 100143947) Report Abuse |
|
ChoadW wrote: The GB defense seems better than I can ever remember
Oh yes sir, this unit is for REAL this year and they are coming to get you!!!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-10-08 21:01:07 (ID: 100143968) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Absolutely agree. First time since i dont know when, that watching Packer's defense is more fun than Packer's O.
The Smith's are the real deal definition of a "Flügelzange". If opponent's Center doesn't answers the name J.Kelce, Kenny Clark's get's dbl-teamed. Now move R.Gary inside, O-Lines have to dbl-dbl-team (just saying, as a professional couch-coach). The DB room with Alexander, King, Savage and Amos recorded 5/7 Int out of 5 games so far. Huge! The valuable depth at DL, OLB and DB not even mentioned. ILB could be a bit better, but who wants to complain with that D performance so far. Last edited on 2019-10-08 21:03:20 by Mücke |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2019-10-10 18:47:25 (ID: 100144013) Report Abuse |
|
Mücke wrote:
ILB could be a bit better, but who wants to complain with that D performance so far. To be fair, Packers have treated that position like it doesn't exist anymore  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-10-10 20:52:13 (ID: 100144016) Report Abuse |
|
True 😂
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 22 23 > >| | |
| Main / American Football in real life / Green Bay Packers | |
