no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Do extra safeties help? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2016-01-09 15:20:49 (ID: 100065692) Report Abuse | |
|
punch drunk wrote:
Rock777 wrote: My point is that it is utterly ridiculous to have a FS blitz when you are expecting a pass. I don't think anyone would do that IRL. At least not without having the SS fall back and take over the FS responsibilities.
Exactly the point. From what I see RZA isn't broken as for safe blitz. It is simming what would/could happen. As for which safety - they both are used in blitzes at times to confuse and disguise. And sometimes they work, sometimes they fail and sometimes the offense can make a huge play from it. AND when a FS blitzes the SS will drop in basically a cover 1 in place of the FS BUT the SS normally isn't as good at pass coverage as a FS. It's a risk trying to make a big play that sometimes costs a big play. I will say we should have the ability to choose if an OLB, MLB, FS or Ss blitzes. It is too general/vague/random and THAT is kind of what could be "fixed".  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
mikemike778
|
posted: 2016-01-10 09:27:28 (ID: 100065733) Report Abuse |
|
punch drunk wrote:
Rock777 wrote: My point is that it is utterly ridiculous to have a FS blitz when you are expecting a pass. I don't think anyone would do that IRL. At least not without having the SS fall back and take over the FS responsibilities.
Exactly the point. From what I see RZA isn't broken as for safe blitz. It is simming what would/could happen. As for which safety - they both are used in blitzes at times to confuse and disguise. And sometimes they work, sometimes they fail and sometimes the offense can make a huge play from it. AND when a FS blitzes the SS will drop in basically a cover 1 in place of the FS BUT the SS normally isn't as good at pass coverage as a FS. It's a risk trying to make a big play that sometimes costs a big play. I will say we should have the ability to choose if an OLB, MLB, FS or Ss blitzes. It is too general/vague/random and THAT is kind of what could be "fixed". This ... Its like Green Bay packers sending Joe Thomas (a coverage nickle linebacker) on a blitz as often as they would do Clay Mathews. Sure you might do it occasionally to catch them by surprise but not have it just as likely. Of course if a team always blitzes its OLB then as an offense, you know where you want to be running the ball don't you so choosing the position isn't darkwing. It'd be good if the game allowed you to utilise more specialist players like blitz packages, 3rd down running backs etc |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
galeucylu
|
posted: 2017-06-25 14:48:29 (ID: 100108667) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
My thought exactly!
Hoverboard for sale Last edited on 2017-06-25 14:50:05 by galeucylu |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Do extra safeties help? | |
