no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Do we need a Commissioner? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-28 19:09:17 (ID: 100094448) Report Abuse |
|
they only way human would be involved. Is a sub committee voted in.
Who work under the computer commissioner |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-12-28 21:54:17 (ID: 100094459) Report Abuse | |
|
There are no plans to involve humans on this one...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2016-12-28 22:22:52 (ID: 100094461) Report Abuse |
|
Yashin wrote:
He could be the authority to fine unsportsmanlike conducts of teams, like those who punt every next dirst downs, teams that use ridiculuos playbooks/roster/tactics. I know that is a dangerous power in the hands of one person, but if the Commisioner himself can be fined after a season of bad management, then the balance can be found. P.S. Sorry ... I understood thet th Commissioner was a human position, elected by the team managers. I didn't realize it was a computer-managed role. My post must be read under the idea of a person that controls the behaviours of other managers in his own league. And why couldn't a computer commissioner fine owners? The stats are there to see and should be easily picked up by a computer. I'm in favour! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-28 22:27:51 (ID: 100094462) Report Abuse |
|
Captain Jack wrote:
Yashin wrote:
He could be the authority to fine unsportsmanlike conducts of teams, like those who punt every next dirst downs, teams that use ridiculuos playbooks/roster/tactics. I know that is a dangerous power in the hands of one person, but if the Commisioner himself can be fined after a season of bad management, then the balance can be found. P.S. Sorry ... I understood thet th Commissioner was a human position, elected by the team managers. I didn't realize it was a computer-managed role. My post must be read under the idea of a person that controls the behaviours of other managers in his own league. And why couldn't a computer commissioner fine owners? The stats are there to see and should be easily picked up by a computer. I'm in favour! I would need to see the tactics that are to be fined before i could agree. As far punting on first down. Sure fine them |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-12-28 22:42:08 (ID: 100094464) Report Abuse | |
|
Let's put "fines" at a second step...for now the question is: ist this something to start with...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
CoachSimpson
|
posted: 2016-12-29 06:27:51 (ID: 100094477) Report Abuse |
|
I could see this work in the higher divisions. I wonder the pros and cons for lower leagues that has many bots and a lot less activity.
Any ideas on that? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-12-29 09:03:48 (ID: 100094483) Report Abuse | |
|
Maybe "more bots more money per human team"...The basic idea was to create a way to bring teams through the offseason from a financial point of view...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2016-12-29 09:35:55 (ID: 100094485) Report Abuse |
|
I really like that idea.
As I understand the commissioner will make only additional income at the beginning. I would prefer that the money will be payed out at the same day the market will close, so this money is a buffer for new teams. Veteran managers do not really need this money. I also like the idea of the fines for a second step.
What I don't really get, is how the traits of the commissioner will be in sight at the election. 
Will it be like: 1. Aaaa is PR manager of the league until now 2. Eeee is New Media manager of the league until now 3. Iiiii is Infrastructural manager of the league until now But how we can see how greedy they are? If this traits open to see, or always the same guy will make the most money, this will lead to the same result each time.
Before we add just another boring click we should make this a really funny feature. A little randomness and stuff for discussions would be really nice.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-12-29 09:40:02 (ID: 100094486) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse | |
|
Greedy/risky vs consistent as example...there are more such combinations. based on the public visible skills the managers can vote. Maybe the guy gets some reputation over the years..."earned 100 million in Galaxy 2.1 Season 26, missed to earn anything in Admirals D 1 Season 27"...
Last edited on 2016-12-29 09:40:31 by pete |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2016-12-29 10:03:31 (ID: 100094487) Report Abuse |
|
I think it would be good if the income of this commissioner could be based on other features that generates income or expenses for the teams, like one guy makes money of sponsors, another one on maintenance. One guy could be also like a insurance on injuries.
So we could get some strategical decision. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Do we need a Commissioner? | |
