no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / Financial warning process reconsideration Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 6 7 8 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
gabriel06
|
posted: 2016-12-30 18:58:14 (ID: 100094690) Report Abuse |
I think the above would be a good addition to the warning, as that covers all bases. It isn't unreasonable for a manager to expect a home game in weeks 1 or 2 so falling foul of this without warning isn't really his fault, and its harsh for them to go punished as has happened....although of course they shouldn't really get into that position in the first place!
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2017-01-01 18:20:53 (ID: 100094759) Report Abuse |
Quimriera wrote:
It is one thing "who have been sensible with their finances" and another is to have accumulated 500 million (or more) and burn a portion of the money each season. I don't understand what the problem is, let's take 2 fake teams as examples. Team A: Saves $50M a season for 10 seasons = $500M of savings after 10 seasons. Then it spends $50M more than it earns per season for 10 seasons = $0. Team B: Spends exactly what it earns every season for 20 seasons = $0. I see both as perfectly valid strategies in this game, no? |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-01 21:20:35 (ID: 100094767) Report Abuse | |
It makes no sense to make such comparisons, since I need ONE solution to fit both "extremes"...And no, the team creating 500 million in 1 season AND then does not spend it for something is not what I had in mind when I created the game. Therefore for me it is no viable tactic to play the game.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2017-01-01 21:39:07 (ID: 100094768) Report Abuse |
I never talked about a team making $500M in 1 season, I said 10 seasons which is 2.5 years in real life versus 3 months, so it's very different to me.
Anyway, if you do not like teams accumulating a lot of cash (even over a long period of time) then simply cap bank accounts. In many games you can't have more than $X period. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-01 21:40:35 (ID: 100094769) Report Abuse | |
A so called tax on huge bankrolls...right?
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2017-01-01 21:43:47 (ID: 100094770) Report Abuse |
I guess you could call it a 100% tax but I'd prefer calling it a hard limit. If you decide that nobody can reach $1B anymore any dollar earned past $999,999,999 would just not go anywhere.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-01 21:46:27 (ID: 100094772) Report Abuse | |
Let the riots start in 2 minutes
Dear RZA Managers: we won't allow you having more than 250 million on your bankrolls, starting with the first gameday of season 25. 3, 2, 1... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2017-01-01 21:49:47 (ID: 100094773) Report Abuse |
I'd prefer getting a longer warning, say by season 30 but I would perfectly understand it if you decided to implement such a change.
Or maybe do it incrementally: No more than $1B from season 25 No more than $900M from season 26 etc... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Bovakian
|
posted: 2017-01-01 21:56:40 (ID: 100094775) Report Abuse |
I'd like to reach 200 million first, but am forecasted to loose between 15 and 30 million a year. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-01 22:03:45 (ID: 100094777) Report Abuse | |
Bovakian wrote:
I'd like to reach 200 million first, but am forecasted to loose between 15 and 30 million a year. Welcome to that club |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 6 7 8 > >| | |
Main / Discussions / Financial warning process reconsideration |