no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / New attempt to create a tax based on income Search Forum | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 12 13 14 > >| | |||||||
| Rating: | |||||||
Poll: Create a tax for seasonal gains of a manager depending on his status and bankroll?,
Poll closed,
votes: 216
|
|||||||
| Poster | Message | ||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:19:58 (ID: 100094519) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
pete wrote:
The idea is to stop teams from creating huge bankrolls, without investing from this money... I don't understand why we are trying to stop this because I don't see how this affects anybody else? If a manager saves 100 gazillion RZA dollars it doesn't affect my team or my enjoyment of the game in any way so I don't really understand why action would be needed. It's like if a manager decided to only field players under 25 years old or only from one country... As long as it doesn't negatively impacts the enjoyment of the game of others I don't see why it should be stopped. If you want to limit the financial advantages of the richest teams in RZA I would suggest limiting spending on weekly players salaries and/or on the TM. For example, you can't spend more than $xM a week on players salary and/or you can't spend more than $yM than you've made in a season on the TM. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:27:38 (ID: 100094521) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Sorry I can not support this. Only because of th e way it works.
I don't mind tax that are base on income. And income alone. but on bank roll is not right. I have sold alot of players,ran at low wages. For along. Time. To be penalize for saving and good money management is worng I can how ever go sliding tax base on profit for the year alone. Last edited on 2016-12-29 14:30:03 by andrew2scott2 |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 14:29:01 (ID: 100094522) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Who the F*ck was talking about a tax on your bankroll...
Last edited on 2016-12-29 14:41:31 by pete |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:31:42 (ID: 100094524) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse | ||||||
|
pete wrote:
I understood that a tax based on the bankroll is not accepted, because the rich managers are the loudest as well ( C'mon,  )
So here is the new proposal: If a manager is "top manager" (aka has a full build stadium) AND If a manager has more than 500 million on his account AND If a manager has gains more than "X" million We cut 20 % of his gains (!!!) above "X" over the season at season-rollover... Manger with over 500 million tax on bank roll.or because of bank roll Remove that line I could go with it Last edited on 2016-12-29 14:33:52 by andrew2scott2 |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 14:32:38 (ID: 100094526) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Firenze wrote:
The test would be for Pete to choose the value of X, then use last seasons data to see which teams would be affected, if the tax was introduced. I suspect only a handful of teams would incur this tax, and only one or two of those teams would be in that top 10 list. X = 75,000,000 gains (not income, not bankroll, much more the money left from any income after expenses) 26 managers Income;Expenses;Gain 361982338;-113514362;248467976 202754259;-91881247;110873012 198120311;-90988188;107132123 145333980;-41916097;103417883 138012505;-35236206;102776299 171737863;-70945741;100792122 141801550;-49070963;92730587 138111259;-45478821;92632438 187247655;-95519921;91727734 132355321;-42710178;89645143 171813505;-82272611;89540894 221347200;-133283129;88064071 247747158;-160495767;87251391 163893764;-77959856;85933908 191809690;-105941777;85867913 157934923;-72916046;85018877 249573954;-165975080;83598874 209544868;-127204566;82340302 148601161;-67633838;80967323 152598823;-73818401;78780422 165300648;-87635314;77665334 100622400;-23176271;77446129 152819417;-76204976;76614441 157396961;-81172897;76224064 157748778;-81916888;75831890 150964057;-75166885;75797172 |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:33:06 (ID: 100094527) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
pete wrote:
I understood that a tax based on the bankroll is not accepted, because the rich managers are the loudest as well ( C'mon, )
So here is the new proposal: If a manager is "top manager" (aka has a full build stadium) AND If a manager has more than 500 million on his account AND If a manager has gains more than "X" million We cut 20 % of his gains (!!!) above "X" over the season at season-rollover... Manger with over 500 million tax on bank roll.or because of bank roll Read Pete's post until the last line. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Templer
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:38:16 (ID: 100094528) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
pete wrote:
The idea is to stop teams from creating huge bankrolls, without investing from this money... Good thinking. 
Wait a minute - what can we deduct from the tax? 
|
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 14:43:04 (ID: 100094532) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
pete wrote:
I understood that a tax based on the bankroll is not accepted, because the rich managers are the loudest as well ( C'mon, )
So here is the new proposal: If a manager is "top manager" (aka has a full build stadium) AND If a manager has more than 500 million on his account AND If a manager has gains more than "X" million We cut 20 % of his gains (!!!) above "X" over the season at season-rollover... Manger with over 500 million tax on bank roll.or because of bank roll Remove that line I could go with it Read the proposal again, please. the 500 million is a protection for teams that are creating their bankroll at that time...only teams having MORE than 500 million on their bankroll AND (!!!) at the same time create enough gains in their actual season are taxpayers... |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 14:44:23 (ID: 100094533) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Templer wrote:
pete wrote:
The idea is to stop teams from creating huge bankrolls, without investing from this money... Good thinking.
Wait a minute - what can we deduct from the tax?
The costs you spend on creating these videos...not
If the Commissioner-Idea passes, you could deduct your charity payments/bribes to that guy |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:46:40 (ID: 100094534) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
pete wrote:
Firenze wrote:
The test would be for Pete to choose the value of X, then use last seasons data to see which teams would be affected, if the tax was introduced. I suspect only a handful of teams would incur this tax, and only one or two of those teams would be in that top 10 list. X = 75,000,000 gains (not income, not bankroll, much more the money left from any income after expenses) 26 managers Income;Expenses;Gain 361982338;-113514362;248467976 202754259;-91881247;110873012 198120311;-90988188;107132123 145333980;-41916097;103417883 138012505;-35236206;102776299 171737863;-70945741;100792122 141801550;-49070963;92730587 138111259;-45478821;92632438 187247655;-95519921;91727734 132355321;-42710178;89645143 171813505;-82272611;89540894 221347200;-133283129;88064071 247747158;-160495767;87251391 163893764;-77959856;85933908 191809690;-105941777;85867913 157934923;-72916046;85018877 249573954;-165975080;83598874 209544868;-127204566;82340302 148601161;-67633838;80967323 152598823;-73818401;78780422 165300648;-87635314;77665334 100622400;-23176271;77446129 152819417;-76204976;76614441 157396961;-81172897;76224064 157748778;-81916888;75831890 150964057;-75166885;75797172 That is more teams than I expected. Are these the teams you wanted to target with this tax? The only one who is greatly affected is the top manager, who would lose 35 million or so. The second manager only loses 6 million, which isnt much. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| reply Mark this thread unread | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 12 13 14 > >| | |||||||
| Main / Suggestions / New attempt to create a tax based on income | |||||||
