no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / What did you do last night ?! Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2017-08-30 12:01:07 (ID: 100113041) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
 Source: https://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/476763RZAELDS27r2.png Last edited on 2017-08-31 13:22:36 by Drogon |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2017-08-31 13:49:33 (ID: 100113207) Report Abuse |
|
Wow, certainly not this!!!
 And the color scheme is intense to say the least.
But in Thunder 1.1 we also saw a lot of good OL draftees. Perhaps Pete trying to balance the O line against the D lines in RZA (meaning it's much easier / cheaper to create a good D line than a good O line). |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Anvala
|
posted: 2017-08-31 14:17:36 (ID: 100113210) Report Abuse |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
But in Thunder 1.1 we also saw a lot of good OL draftees. Perhaps Pete trying to balance the O line against the D lines in RZA (meaning it's much easier / cheaper to create a good D line than a good O line). I think it's a random like thing. In Dragons there was a lot LB's this season. @Drogon - how did your draft pan out? Did your sheets work the way you wanted them to? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-08-31 14:38:50 (ID: 100113212) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
Anvala wrote:
Cheesehead wrote:
But in Thunder 1.1 we also saw a lot of good OL draftees. Perhaps Pete trying to balance the O line against the D lines in RZA (meaning it's much easier / cheaper to create a good D line than a good O line). I think it's a random like thing. In Dragons there was a lot LB's this season. @Drogon - how did your draft pan out? Did your sheets work the way you wanted them to? I imagine it's reasonably random, but we did have 16 OL's in Dragons 1.1 and there were 3 I thought were quite good left for round 2. Last edited on 2017-08-31 14:39:06 by Jonny Utah |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-08-31 15:45:00 (ID: 100113216) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
Anvala wrote:
@Drogon - how did your draft pan out? Did your sheets work the way you wanted them to? I think so. Not sure I did understand what you meant. Do you mind asking again in other words ? 
Last edited on 2017-08-31 15:46:31 by Drogon |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Stanford87
|
posted: 2017-08-31 16:50:12 (ID: 100113221) Report Abuse |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
Wow, certainly not this!!! And the color scheme is intense to say the least.
But in Thunder 1.1 we also saw a lot of good OL draftees. Perhaps Pete trying to balance the O line against the D lines in RZA (meaning it's much easier / cheaper to create a good D line than a good O line). Could you elaborate on that? I always thought the D line was more expensive, since OL & interior DL can be build through the YA but DEs are one of the most expensive position groups in RZA. I would be happy to hear a different opinion on that though. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
oakbark
|
posted: 2017-08-31 18:29:07 (ID: 100113227) Report Abuse |
|
Stanford87 wrote:
Cheesehead wrote:
Wow, certainly not this!!! And the color scheme is intense to say the least.
But in Thunder 1.1 we also saw a lot of good OL draftees. Perhaps Pete trying to balance the O line against the D lines in RZA (meaning it's much easier / cheaper to create a good D line than a good O line). Could you elaborate on that? I always thought the D line was more expensive, since OL & interior DL can be build through the YA but DEs are one of the most expensive position groups in RZA. I would be happy to hear a different opinion on that though. The top end young DE are way more expensive but i do find that good OL even veterans always sell for good money. Presumably thats because you need more OL and there are a lot of average ones or low XP ones around. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
jmehnert86
|
posted: 2017-09-01 04:43:10 (ID: 100113244) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Dude, I work in Excel all day long, and I have no idea what I'm looking at, lol.
Edit: I think I get it now. Last edited on 2017-09-01 04:46:13 by jmehnert86 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-09-01 05:28:27 (ID: 100113245) Report Abuse | |
|
Jonny Utah wrote:
I imagine it's reasonably random, but we did have 16 OL's in Dragons 1.1 and there were 3 I thought were quite good left for round 2. I got one of them late 2nd round. 
I did notice we didn't have any punters this draft and just a very few really good LBer's. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-09-01 08:51:23 (ID: 100113261) Report Abuse | |
|
jmehnert86 wrote:
Dude, I work in Excel all day long, and I have no idea what I'm looking at, lol. Edit: I think I get it now. It's about nuke warheads since Cold War in communist countries, NATO countries and the Martian Ally. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / What did you do last night ?! | |
