no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / 1 QB vs 2 QBs Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Sharkn20
|
posted: 2017-11-27 09:46:06 (ID: 100119626) Report Abuse |
|
Noticed some tendencies here with some teams going all in with 1 QB and others with 2 QBs.
What are the advantages / disadvantages of each system? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-11-27 10:03:31 (ID: 100119628) Report Abuse |
|
I use 1 QB because I want to maximize experience earned. My highest trained player starts for me, but he's currently less experienced than my backup. He has factors, traits/caps/etc. that makes it important for him to monopolize playing time because I'm looking forward to the long-term benefit.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-11-27 10:17:54 (ID: 100119633) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
IMO it comes down to Wages and quality of player on the pitch. I don't think anyone would want to waste 1 million per u p d a t e on 2 x 50 skilled QB's, and because I want my best players on the pitch most of the time, I would always "First String" my best QB for league and important Cup matches.... Simple as that.
I don't see much if any drop off in Q4 
If you don't have a 50 (ish) skilled QB, then Exp would be the next argument... Last edited on 2017-11-27 10:18:42 by dell_g |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Superpippo
|
posted: 2017-11-27 10:30:29 (ID: 100119634) Report Abuse |
|
I have 3 but each with a purpose,
1 is my number 1 qb, he plays every league and supercup game except for those against bots. He's on a franchise contract, to keep wage as low as possible for as long as I can. since he's only 23 he'll be in this position for at least another 7 seasons. My number 2 quarterback is a reserve in case my other qb is injured, he's not that good but he won't be awful either when he needs to step up. As soon as I feel his wages are getting too high, I sell or fire him to buy another or replace him with number 3. Number 3 I take a young work in progress, I play him in friendlies and bot games to get exp and when he's ready he becomes a number 2 and we look for a new number 3. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-11-27 10:39:25 (ID: 100119636) Report Abuse | |
|
I would play Reid Hobson with a 1st string tick in all league and cup games until he retirees.....! He's a goodun, just needs more Exp
In about 6 seasons, get yourself his long term replacement and play him in easy Cup games and friendlies for Exp and repeat forever... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sharkn20
|
posted: 2017-11-27 10:49:06 (ID: 100119638) Report Abuse |
|
dell_g wrote:
I would play Reid Hobson with a 1st string tick in all league and cup games until he retirees.....! He's a goodun, just needs more Exp
In about 6 seasons, get yourself his long term replacement and play him in easy Cup games and friendlies for Exp and repeat forever... Thanks for the free advice!!!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2017-11-27 10:59:01 (ID: 100119639) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
dell_g wrote:
IMO it comes down to Wages and quality of player on the pitch. I don't think anyone would want to waste 1 million per u p d a t e on 2 x 50 skilled QB's, and because I want my best players on the pitch most of the time, I would always "First String" my best QB for league and important Cup matches.... Simple as that. I don't see much if any drop off in Q4
If you don't have a 50 (ish) skilled QB, then Exp would be the next argument... I'd be interested in seeing how much of a drop off there is between playing 1 QB all game or rotating 2 or 3 of them. The RZA All-Stars could help measure that since they rotate 3 QBs. Last edited on 2017-11-27 11:02:14 by Meitheisman |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
jetto
|
posted: 2017-11-27 14:49:21 (ID: 100119665) Report Abuse |
|
I tried both (2 QB Starters vs. 1 QB Starter) and I couldn't find significant better results with one or the other. (despite the financal aspect!).
I think it's a question everybody needs to answer on himself depending how you want to build/play the game... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-11-27 15:53:24 (ID: 100119675) Report Abuse |
|
Experience is a huge factor in the game. If you don't play a guy every snap, he won't gain experience as fast. That's the primary reason I generally stick with one.
I'm using two right now, but that is just because of where both my QBs are in development. I have 1 skilled veteran "backup", and one skilled young "Starter." They both have 5* Experience and solid skills, so I am playing them both. Two advantages: they have more energy during the game, they have very different physical builds so it is harder to plan against them defensively. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
amalric7
|
posted: 2017-11-27 18:43:15 (ID: 100119689) Report Abuse |
|
Superpippo wrote:
I have 3 but each with a purpose Same here, and I see them in exactly the same way. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / 1 QB vs 2 QBs | |
