no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Thunder / THUNDER 1.1 SEASON 30 THREAD Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 11 12 13 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
oakbark
|
posted: 2018-05-12 08:53:34 (ID: 100128400) Report Abuse |
|
Good luck in season 30 Thunderians
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
passionatelad
|
posted: 2018-05-12 12:38:35 (ID: 100128414) Report Abuse |
|
oakbark wrote:
Good luck in season 30 Thunderians Thank you, Good luck all |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2018-05-12 13:02:05 (ID: 100128415) Report Abuse |
|
What a start: 5 interceptions and I still lose only due to a safety
 Worst start ever for my beloved Alligators.
But the second time that Xu Da has beaten me at home now...well done mate! For my sake I hope the tide is not turning! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2018-05-12 13:04:51 (ID: 100128416) Report Abuse |
|
Wow Green Machine has an even worse day then me
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tabula Rasa
|
posted: 2018-05-12 13:08:00 (ID: 100128417) Report Abuse |
|
What a thriller! A game winning touchdown in the final minute of play.. great game Ridge City!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
passionatelad
|
posted: 2018-05-12 14:05:24 (ID: 100128424) Report Abuse |
|
I just lost due to the shotgun again despite using my match of the year. Pete was supposed to have sorted this and clearly hasn't.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2018-05-12 15:46:24 (ID: 100128441) Report Abuse |
|
passionatelad wrote:
I just lost due to the shotgun again despite using my match of the year. Pete was supposed to have sorted this and clearly hasn't. Re shotgun, you did sack him 8 times when he used the shotgun so that is 21% of his shotgun plays so I would say that that is a very successful pass rush. He won the game on an pick six as well. So all in all I think he didn't benefit so much from shotgun as to cause the win. I understand it's hard to take when using MOTY but analyse and adjust I would say. Your run game wasn't great and having 50% of your plays being a run stifled your offence I would say. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
passionatelad
|
posted: 2018-05-12 16:12:21 (ID: 100128445) Report Abuse |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
passionatelad wrote:
I just lost due to the shotgun again despite using my match of the year. Pete was supposed to have sorted this and clearly hasn't. Re shotgun, you did sack him 8 times when he used the shotgun so that is 21% of his shotgun plays so I would say that that is a very successful pass rush. He won the game on an pick six as well. So all in all I think he didn't benefit so much from shotgun as to cause the win. I understand it's hard to take when using MOTY but analyse and adjust I would say. Your run game wasn't great and having 50% of your plays being a run stifled your offence I would say. I had it based on the Run simply because of high risk from sacks. I tried to adjust and stop that from happening by using the run. I also don't believe this would have happened had his Tactics not been lopsided and basically biased towards one formation. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
oakbark
|
posted: 2018-05-12 18:21:18 (ID: 100128454) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
passionatelad wrote:
I just lost due to the shotgun again despite using my match of the year. Pete was supposed to have sorted this and clearly hasn't. Re shotgun, you did sack him 8 times when he used the shotgun so that is 21% of his shotgun plays so I would say that that is a very successful pass rush. He won the game on an pick six as well. So all in all I think he didn't benefit so much from shotgun as to cause the win. I understand it's hard to take when using MOTY but analyse and adjust I would say. Your run game wasn't great and having 50% of your plays being a run stifled your offence I would say. I just don't think the 335 is a great matchup against the SG. If we look at mechanics its not great at stopping the run and it adds an extra safety into the mix when in game safety don't seem to match up often in coverage being spare men. the 335 has one MLB 2 OLB and 2 CB. So outside passes go to CB inside to LB. Plus SF often arent as good players as CB or OLB who are more than adequate as pass defenders. Honest I am I the process of ditching the 335 against the SG i don't think it offers anything the 344 doesn't except weakening the central field. I would take an extra MLB over SF in a heartbeat with the current mechanics. Last edited on 2018-05-12 18:25:54 by oakbark |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
passionatelad
|
posted: 2018-05-12 19:03:44 (ID: 100128458) Report Abuse |
|
oakbark wrote:
Cheesehead wrote:
passionatelad wrote:
I just lost due to the shotgun again despite using my match of the year. Pete was supposed to have sorted this and clearly hasn't. Re shotgun, you did sack him 8 times when he used the shotgun so that is 21% of his shotgun plays so I would say that that is a very successful pass rush. He won the game on an pick six as well. So all in all I think he didn't benefit so much from shotgun as to cause the win. I understand it's hard to take when using MOTY but analyse and adjust I would say. Your run game wasn't great and having 50% of your plays being a run stifled your offence I would say. I just don't think the 335 is a great matchup against the SG. If we look at mechanics its not great at stopping the run and it adds an extra safety into the mix when in game safety don't seem to match up often in coverage being spare men. the 335 has one MLB 2 OLB and 2 CB. So outside passes go to CB inside to LB. Plus SF often arent as good players as CB or OLB who are more than adequate as pass defenders. Honest I am I the process of ditching the 335 against the SG i don't think it offers anything the 344 doesn't except weakening the central field. I would take an extra MLB over SF in a heartbeat with the current mechanics. But the problem I've got is the 344 is just completely ineffective to. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 11 12 13 > >| | |
| Main / Thunder / THUNDER 1.1 SEASON 30 THREAD | |
