no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Player Injuries - realism vs fun Search Forum | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 8 9 10 > >| | |||||||
Poll: Should we add game ending injuries? See the details below!,
Poll closed,
votes: 140
|
|||||||
| Poster | Message | ||||||
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2018-11-05 19:46:10 (ID: 100134231) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
I realised btw that adding injuries without a salary cap is just gonna give advantage to clubs with a large bank balance as they can afford depth in their squads to cover for injuries and it will really hit new players most.
So I am changing my vote to "Yes, add game ending injuries BUT first implement salary cap"  |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-05 20:37:19 (ID: 100134236) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
What would be an acceptable salary cap?
Steve SD Blitz |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-05 20:48:41 (ID: 100134239) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Cheesehead wrote:
I realised btw that adding injuries without a salary cap is just gonna give advantage to clubs with a large bank balance as they can afford depth in their squads to cover for injuries and it will really hit new players most. So I am changing my vote to "Yes, add game ending injuries BUT first implement salary cap" Without the cap though could it not get people to spend their money and decrease their bank balances? |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-05 21:00:35 (ID: 100134240) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
The cap is from my point of view the spots on the roster.
Assuming you plan on a deeper bench, then the spendings will rise, which can become unhealthy quite quickly and everyone has to think twice whether to add that addition (likely good and expensive) player to the roster. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2018-11-05 23:12:49 (ID: 100134255) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
All this Angst against game-ending-injuries is unsubstantiated.
|
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-11-06 10:07:40 (ID: 100134265) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
There is no angst, just a request for more options if we are going to be given more challenges.
 |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
hollyhh2000
|
posted: 2018-11-06 12:47:33 (ID: 100134268) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
As there is talk about a cap in this thread:
Imo, a cap would not change much, if any The managers who now manage their teams close to their budget and get the most talent out their current budget, would get the best talent out of their capped budget, why should that change? successful teams will earn more money than they do now as they cannot spent it on players and would use that extra cash to buy the best available players. So probably the same guys who call now for a cap would then call for another change
If we really want more parity, we need to change the financial system. The percentage of the budget from postseason games for a successfull team is huge. I once made a sort of a proposal (but not an official suggestion) to change the wage system to the NFL's wage system. in short: Pay the yearly salary completely in the regular season Give the players additional salary for each postseason game This would limit the additional financial gain for successful teams (could be adjusted by the percentage the players get from postseason earnings) and save new managers from the trap of having to pay one month of extra salary with no regular match earnings. I may put in a suggestion, when I have the time to do so. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-06 15:23:02 (ID: 100134275) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
hollyhh2000 wrote:
If we really want more parity, we need to change the financial system. The percentage of the budget from postseason games for a successfull team is huge. I Agree. The question is how to reduce this advantage. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-11-06 20:01:05 (ID: 100134278) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Pete probably built this incentive on purpose to reward more successful managers, not sure why that needs to be changed. Those who win more than me make more money and those who win less than me make less, I really don't think there's anything wrong with that. More parity also means a greater luck factor, if I wanted to play a game based on luck I would buy lottery tickets.
|
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2018-11-06 21:24:51 (ID: 100134279) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
sal-cap etc. not off-topic? Anyway, i second that. Why else (despite for fame) we should head for the playoff spots if not for getting $ bonus out of it. And remember the draft position PO teams gain (disadventage enough imo).
Back on track, guys. Think smart. If we get game-ending injuries (from which i suppose they wont harm that much as you are afraid of), we can produce more pressure on Pete afterwards on having 2nd and/or 3rd Stringer options in depth chart. One step after the other 
|
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| reply Mark this thread unread | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 8 9 10 > >| | |||||||
| Main / Discussions / Player Injuries - realism vs fun | |||||||
