no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Player Injuries - realism vs fun Search Forum | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 9 10 > >| | |||||||
Poll: Should we add game ending injuries? See the details below!,
Poll closed,
votes: 140
|
|||||||
| Poster | Message | ||||||
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2018-11-06 21:33:24 (ID: 100134280) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Meitheisman wrote:
Pete probably built this incentive on purpose to reward more successful managers, not sure why that needs to be changed. Those who win more than me make more money and those who win less than me make less, I really don't think there's anything wrong with that. More parity also means a greater luck factor, if I wanted to play a game based on luck I would buy lottery tickets. You should change this complete sport. (#Colts) |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2018-11-06 22:34:00 (ID: 100134282) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Mücke wrote:
Back on track, guys. Think smart. If we get game-ending injuries (from which i suppose they wont harm that much as you are afraid of), we can produce more pressure on Pete afterwards on having 2nd and/or 3rd Stringer options in depth chart. One step after the other 
really appreciate your machiavellian approach to the forum, even though I'm on the other side of this argument. reminds me of a younger Buddy 
Last edited on 2018-11-06 23:23:27 by Buddy Ryan |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2018-11-06 23:02:32 (ID: 100134283) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
hollyhh2000 wrote:
As there is talk about a cap in this thread: Imo, a cap would not change much, if any The managers who now manage their teams close to their budget and get the most talent out their current budget, would get the best talent out of their capped budget, why should that change? successful teams will earn more money than they do now as they cannot spent it on players and would use that extra cash to buy the best available players. why I consider a cap a good solution: it takes the huge accumulated fortunes out of the game, without taking the cash actually away from the managers bank accounts (which will never happen). sure, teams who manage their rosters and finances well now will continue to be successfull, but thats also the point of the game. a cap stops the ability to just train up all skills to 50 and "buy" a competitive team that way, without actually managing the team well. (though "good managing" is also a very subjective perception, I'd not wanna be the judge of that...) on the other hand I'm not sure a change in income structure alone would change the massive disparities between bank accounts that are already loaded and the rest of us poor poor fellas 
but this is mostly hypothetical now anyway I guess, I dont see any good teams that just ride a huge bank account to be honest...  |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-07 00:41:24 (ID: 100134285) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Mücke wrote:
Why else (despite for fame) we should head for the playoff spots if not for getting $ bonus out of it. Maybe trying things and be successful ? Just like some challenges. You know, the playoffs are merely some more games in a season Mücke wrote:
And remember the draft position PO teams gain (disadventage enough imo). I think you're right when you say no PO means an advantage in the draft. Mücke wrote:
Back on track, guys. Think smart. If we get game-ending injuries (from which i suppose they wont harm that much as you are afraid of) I did not notice someone was afraid of game-ending injuries. I've read things where some of us believe game-ending injuries should go along with more options. Mücke wrote:
we can produce more pressure on Pete afterwards on having 2nd and/or 3rd Stringer options in depth chart. One step after the other
Add Second string option (at least for some positions) - REFUSED Then, next step is awaiting. Let's go ! |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-11-07 12:50:42 (ID: 100134296) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Mücke wrote:
Back on track, guys. Think smart. If we get game-ending injuries (from which i suppose they wont harm that much as you are afraid of), we can produce more pressure on Pete afterwards on having 2nd and/or 3rd Stringer options in depth chart. One step after the other
Exactly, one step after another, first give us the options to change things and then add complications. You don't throw a kid in the middle of the ocean before teaching him how to swim  |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-07 13:49:02 (ID: 100134300) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Meitheisman wrote:
You don't throw a kid in the middle of the ocean before teaching him how to swim When was this rule invented? Sorry, kid... |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-07 18:35:15 (ID: 100134308) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
pete wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
You don't throw a kid in the middle of the ocean before teaching him how to swim When was this rule invented? Sorry, kid... It all began a long time ago : "But when the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified (...) (...) he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, ‘Lord, save me!’" |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-07 21:28:30 (ID: 100134310) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Meitheisman wrote:
You don't throw a kid in the middle of the ocean before teaching him how to swim Never let Meitheisman teach your kids to swim! |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2018-11-09 20:17:07 (ID: 100134338) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Drogon wrote:
pete wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
You don't throw a kid in the middle of the ocean before teaching him how to swim When was this rule invented? Sorry, kid... It all began a long time ago : "But when the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified (...) (...) he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, ‘Lord, save me!’" is this a coincidence?! :-) noticed this above drogon's post: Drogon / Gardians Drogon owns a supporter account / Joined: 2011-12-07/S02 / Posts: 666 Top Manager Last edited on 2018-11-09 20:18:25 by Cheesehead |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2018-11-09 23:24:50 (ID: 100134341) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Cheesehead wrote:
Drogon wrote:
pete wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
You don't throw a kid in the middle of the ocean before teaching him how to swim When was this rule invented? Sorry, kid... It all began a long time ago : "But when the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified (...) (...) he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, ‘Lord, save me!’" is this a coincidence?! :-) noticed this above drogon's post: Drogon / Gardians Drogon owns a supporter account / Joined: 2011-12-07/S02 / Posts: 666 Top Manager That's a Revelation... |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| reply Mark this thread unread | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 9 10 > >| | |||||||
| Main / Discussions / Player Injuries - realism vs fun | |||||||
