no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Restructuring the league Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 29 30 31 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2019-03-17 10:42:45 (ID: 100137697) Report Abuse | |
|
Kanar wrote:
which will be quite tough to simulate.Except if there is a way to index their level on the league they are, like suggested in my previous post.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2019-03-17 16:48:58 (ID: 100137704) Report Abuse |
|
It is so long since I began to play that I cannot remember the strength of my initial team. The one thing I know for certain is that it was rubbish. Without mentors and friends I would have struggled for a while longer. Also I began in 3.x which no longer exists so there may be no current comparison.
As I understand it bots are stronger than they used to be. However, we want them to be A) weak enough for new teams to usually beat but B) strong enough to prepare new teams for 1.x Some options I would offer: 1. Turn off auto bot flush to 1.x (even for bowl game winners and losers) so that managers have time, if they wish, to build their team. 2. Publish the average strength of each league so that managers know what to expect and to what level they should be aiming. 3. Give new managers a team to meet condition A & B above. 4. Set bot teams to meet condition A & B above To give an example - suppose that this season the average strength of RZA is 80, 1.x 70 and 2.x 60 then all new teams coming in should have a team strength of 55 and bots a strength of 50. (It may be easier to calculate this just once per season) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-17 16:52:25 (ID: 100137706) Report Abuse | |
|
Wouldnt that result in a team joing stronger region A would have stronger initial players, while a team in region B (being weaker than region A) would receive a weaker team?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2019-03-17 17:19:26 (ID: 100137707) Report Abuse |
|
No, because I said the average.
Of course that might mean a newer team in one region having a stronger team than an existing manager in another but I wouldn't expect it to be significantly better and anyway this should even out over time. You could even apply the average regionally and/or limit choices so as to place newer teams in the region(s) that you wish. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-18 06:22:52 (ID: 100137717) Report Abuse | |
|
The solution cannot be to adjust bot teams. The real solutions can only be in a real reform of the league structure.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-18 15:11:16 (ID: 100137723) Report Abuse | |
|
Buziano wrote:
in a real reform of the league structure. As said many times that won't happen. I would prefer closing RZA over changing the whole leagues structure. Things we are bound to until RZA is dying: 32 teams per league containing 8 divisisions in 2 conferences, 8 regions |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
marinarul10
|
posted: 2019-03-18 15:16:38 (ID: 100137725) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Buziano wrote:
in a real reform of the league structure. As said many times that won't happen. I would prefer closing RZA over changing the whole leagues structure. Things we are bound to until RZA is dying: 32 teams per league containing 8 divisisions in 2 conferences, 8 regions What about this? Kanar wrote:
1/ Playoff game between 2nd of League 1 and 3rd of Elite. From an awesome game, you get an almost perfect one! No idea how hard it would be to code if ever Pete agrees some day. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2019-03-18 18:02:07 (ID: 100137729) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Buziano wrote:
in a real reform of the league structure. As said many times that won't happen. I would prefer closing RZA over changing the whole leagues structure. Things we are bound to until RZA is dying: 32 teams per league containing 8 divisisions in 2 conferences, 8 regions Pre Elite NC and Pre Elite AC between Elite and 1X would meet these requirements. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-18 18:13:48 (ID: 100137730) Report Abuse | |
|
"pre"? What does that mean?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-18 18:14:43 (ID: 100137731) Report Abuse | |
|
marinarul10 wrote:
pete wrote:
Buziano wrote:
in a real reform of the league structure. As said many times that won't happen. I would prefer closing RZA over changing the whole leagues structure. Things we are bound to until RZA is dying: 32 teams per league containing 8 divisisions in 2 conferences, 8 regions What about this? Kanar wrote:
1/ Playoff game between 2nd of League 1 and 3rd of Elite. From an awesome game, you get an almost perfect one! No idea how hard it would be to code if ever Pete agrees some day. This is not about changing the inner structure of a league, the reason why we can discuss Kanars suggestion seriously |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 29 30 31 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Restructuring the league | |
