no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / 20 year old in YA Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-03-09 13:52:42 (ID: 100137430) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
I was thinking about this again, and cannot see any downsides of raising the number of YA slots for premium. Did I miss something? If you do so, I would be one of the firsts who would say: Thank you! But that "thank you" would just come from my ego-centered "my team first" point of view. More slots would raise my chance to s e l e c t more high prospects to senior team at the end of their YA time each season. I'm zwiegespalten. From more overall point of view, more slots would be a downer. One long-term consequence would be, that the draft would become more obsolete. Would regret that more than not having more YA slots. Maybe I am a little bit old-school, but I think my roster should be build more from draft than from YA. Also, more slots (= more senior team selections), would be the final nail to the already half-dead transfermarket. Sorry, pls, no more slots for prem. YA. - - - Edit: haha Jack, nearly simultaneously  
Last edited on 2019-03-09 14:07:06 by Mücke |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Mücke
|
posted: 2019-03-09 14:53:58 (ID: 100137433) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
jack6 wrote:
So the bottom line for me is, each team with premium can very much sustain their team better by their own acadamy and will need less help from the draft and market. Is this a downside? I mean you pay for it. For the game? Of course! Dont you think? - - - If you are planning to raise the number of YA slots, please consider to reduce the number of players enabled to promote to senior team as well. +5 slots comes with -2 promotable players, for instance. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-09 17:56:18 (ID: 100137438) Report Abuse | |
|
pete wrote:
jack6 wrote:
So the bottom line for me is, each team with premium can very much sustain their team better by their own acadamy and will need less help from the draft and market. Is this a downside? I mean you pay for it. I pay for it already for those 2% to 5% better training (as it seems in my latest number research, could be more) and the slow TC gain and EXP gain. As said there are ups and downs from my point of view. I would not be so radical to reduce the numbers for promotion. What could happen is, that some teams could actually skip the YA at all, since the amount of young pospects available might get up and that might be cheaper than YA or premium YA. Hard to predict. As said I would like to have some more spots, but honestly I can live with those I have. I would also love to have some kind of better selection process, but of cause it always can be "better" for a manager. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2019-03-10 12:52:30 (ID: 100137463) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
I think 5 more spots would be nice, and I could also live with 1 promotion spot less. It would make the selection process more interesting.
If the draft gets some more gems with the overall quality staying the same, it could make the draft and the TF more intersting. (OK, I don't use the TF by default. Let's look how this turns out for me) Last edited on 2019-03-10 12:53:41 by Schwabe |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / 20 year old in YA | |
