Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / Lpside tactics Search Forum
Navigation: |<   1 2  3  4  5  6  >   >|  
Poster Message
Tullo Ostilio
posted: 2019-09-28 14:48:38 (ID: 100143677)  Edits found: 1 Report Abuse
"Having a playbook, showing strong signs for lopsided tactics: the defense gets a small advantage".

This is the drive against me at 4 period with the same QB(he could be tired):
11 plays on 12 were Shotgun 4w
8 on 11 were complete(73%),one sack and 2 miss
result 83yards and TD

I play against a team that I beat last season 2 times and has had 4/12 record.
I play at home.
All this just for saying that he wasn't strong then my team.
We can say that this year we have same strenght,but the question is;
WHERE IS THE PENALTY?

Immagine a NFL team do the same play 11/12 times in a drive.

I think that do more than 2 times the same play in a row should be strongly penalize.
TY for patience

Last edited on 2019-09-28 14:50:40 by Tullo Ostilio

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Lucky Clem
The Pinellas Pikes

Usa   Lucky Clem owns a supporter account

Joined: 2017-11-15/S27
Posts: 271
Top Manager



 
posted: 2019-09-28 17:25:12 (ID: 100143680) Report Abuse
I saw the Buccaneers run up the middle 7 straight plays just last Sunday! But then I am talking about the Bucs
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Cheesehead
posted: 2019-09-29 18:59:35 (ID: 100143708) Report Abuse
I watched the Broncos run up the middle continuously against the Packers
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Tullo Ostilio
posted: 2019-09-30 11:53:18 (ID: 100143720) Report Abuse
So you mean that is fear score with 11 same plays on 12.

Poor me,I waist many days building a mix and varied playbook.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
pete
H2TAGIT4Q

Europe   pete owns a supporter account   pete is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-01/S00
Posts: 20472
Top Manager



 
posted: 2019-09-30 14:38:29 (ID: 100143731) Report Abuse
Don't build your angriness on the world "small advantage". The impact is quite significant, you can win over superior teams due this advantage. And no, I will not quantify this any further.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Tullo Ostilio
posted: 2019-09-30 16:11:58 (ID: 100143735) Report Abuse
pete wrote:
Don't build your angriness on the world "small advantage". The impact is quite significant, you can win over superior teams due this advantage. And no, I will not quantify this any further.


Didn't seems,but that's it. I know that you whatch out at the problem. TY
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Cheesehead
posted: 2019-10-01 07:41:28 (ID: 100143745) Report Abuse
But now for a serious answer mate. One game is a very small sample size. Get a couple of seasons of data and you can make conclusions. There are many factors affecting a game. And it can be very frustrating indeed. But scouting in combination with the lopsided penalty can help. But there are days that you will lose while playing better.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Ceynwyn
posted: 2019-10-01 07:58:44 (ID: 100143746) Report Abuse
Personally I agree with Ostilio. In my last supercup game against Misawa I lost and he only played shotgun 4 pass on offense and 5-2 defence.
Imho I don't see the point in putting so much effort on a playbook and studying your opponent with this scenario.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
pete
H2TAGIT4Q

Europe   pete owns a supporter account   pete is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-01/S00
Posts: 20472
Top Manager



 
posted: 2019-10-01 08:22:57 (ID: 100143747) Report Abuse
I do not allow myself to provide help on tactics, but if your opponent is running a heavy rush defense, act accordingly. Playbooks make sense.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Ceynwyn
posted: 2019-10-01 08:53:04 (ID: 100143748) Report Abuse
pete wrote:
I do not allow myself to provide help on tactics, but if your opponent is running a heavy rush defense, act accordingly. Playbooks make sense.


of course.
What I'm saying is just that if a penalty DO exist and so the lpside tactics is seen as "uncorrect", it shouldn't be me to adapt to an uncorrect tactic but the penalty should kick in.

I have much respect for what you do with this game Pete so this is only an opinion, I don't claim anything
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   1 2  3  4  5  6  >   >|  
Main / Discussions / Lpside tactics