no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Rework young Academy-parts of it done Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Tullo Ostilio
|
posted: 2020-07-19 10:09:41 (ID: 100150748) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
There are some point that I'll like should be cange in young academy:
1)Delete 20yo players in youth pull.They are useless,not trainable to growth them at a decent point (STR,SPD,AGI and skills)to make them god reserve in first team. 2)Introduce a 15yo players in youth pull.All the opposite considerations of point 1.It can be introduce 15yo players only for Academy owners. (It could be better have 15yo players but not necessary). 3)Slightly increase the main skill base on position and year when you pick from youth pull before assistant trainer bonus. For example a 16yo WR can have Catching 15,a 17yo wr 18 Catch,a 18yo WR 21 Catch and a 19yo WR 24 Catc. That's it. Less but significant changed. TY for reading.  Last edited on 2020-07-19 10:10:20 by Tullo Ostilio |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tpal70
|
posted: 2020-07-20 14:27:23 (ID: 100150804) Report Abuse |
|
Yeah, 20 yo are worthless on the Youth Pull.
Not sure I like the 15 yo aspect, but at least the pull could contain 16, 17, 18, and 19's only. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dumpling
|
posted: 2020-07-20 14:34:22 (ID: 100150805) Report Abuse |
|
The fun of managing the youth academy is seeing the development of younger players over time so would agree with getting rid of 20yo and having a spread that is weighted to the younger age groupings
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
PJRAVENS
|
posted: 2020-07-20 16:20:08 (ID: 100150811) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
dumpling wrote:
The fun of managing the youth academy is seeing the development of younger players over time so would agree with getting rid of 20yo and having a spread that is weighted to the younger age groupings +1 (At least paying Premium YA...)Last edited on 2020-07-20 16:20:55 by PJRAVENS |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
fumbl3
|
posted: 2020-07-20 16:50:38 (ID: 100150813) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Tpal70 wrote:
Yeah, 20 yo are worthless on the Youth Pull. Not sure I like the 15 yo aspect, but at least the pull could contain 16, 17, 18, and 19's only.
 no more 20 years old!! no more 20 years old!!
I think it is the "fairest" and easiest solution to implement. Last edited on 2020-07-20 16:57:10 by fumbl3 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sandrez
|
posted: 2020-07-22 18:35:51 (ID: 100150880) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
agree to the "no more 20yo" option
not sure about the 15yo ok for some difference of skills between 16-17-18-19 yo Last edited on 2020-07-22 18:36:40 by sandrez |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
badgers
|
posted: 2020-07-23 03:13:12 (ID: 100150890) Report Abuse |
|
There's so many posts regarding the YA right now that idk if this is the right one to post in, but oh well, here's my two cents' worth:
1. I support no more 20-year-olds in youth pull. They're useless. 2. I don't support skill boosts for youth players based on age. It's not that hard, if you know how to train, to get good skills for your YA players. You just have to have some patience and be a little picky with who you invest a YA spot in. 3. I don't support adding 15-year-olds to the YA unless training is slowed down or players can only stay in YA until 19 (which would then make 19-year-old youth players useless). This is related to my second point. This would just worsen the problem we have right now of an overabundance of good players. The TM would flood further, and the team-building aspect of the game could quickly disappear if every team has a ton of guys that have spent 6, yes 6, full seasons in the YA. Slowing training down would keep these 15-year-olds in check; it would also lessen the amount of really good players out there, therefore increasing the value of the TM. If this was implemented I might support lowering the minimum age of YA players to 15. Thoughts? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
fumbl3
|
posted: 2020-07-23 06:29:50 (ID: 100150898) Report Abuse |
|
The game must remain balanced and therefore have to be made small changes.
I think should only be changed this aspect. (no more 20yo) I don't know how much it will affects the future Market, but if it were useful, I would also give up one / two promotion slots. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2020-07-24 15:55:56 (ID: 100150927) Report Abuse | |
|
From the change log
no 20 ys old pulls, make the others kind of equal to the former spread, lower chance of becoming P or K |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Maynard
|
posted: 2020-07-24 16:05:00 (ID: 100150929) Report Abuse |
|
whoa
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Rework young Academy-parts of it done | |
