no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / What to do with this guy thread... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 183 184 185 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Stanford87
|
posted: 2017-08-01 17:18:41 (ID: 100110732) Report Abuse |
|
I have a quite talented young receiver who has no chance to get any snaps at his position (as I have at least 4 even more talented receivers), so I'm wondering whether it would be a smart idea to move him to QB, as he already has 32 VIS and POS and AGI are in the 20s too, so it wouldn't be too hard to convert him.
Point is that even though he has great speed (50), his Int (43.5) and strength (38.5) aren't state of the art for a QB. So what do you guys think? Would this guy work out as a (mostly back-up) QB? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
jetto
|
posted: 2017-08-01 21:10:36 (ID: 100110756) Report Abuse |
|
Depends on what you want from a backup QB
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-08-02 00:07:18 (ID: 100110772) Report Abuse |
|
Because of his intelligence, I think his passing window will be too low. I would convert him to CB. What he lacks in ability to tackle, he should make up for with the ability to cover WRs and intercept the football.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-08-02 02:54:21 (ID: 100110779) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse | |
|
Honestly - the QB must be a 50 is a myth as far as I'm concerned.
40 and above is absolutely fine. I would prefer his strength a little higher for QB. Use him (or sell) as a WR. His speed is 
Or convert him to a free safety if you need one.  Last edited on 2017-08-02 02:56:26 by punch drunk |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-08-02 04:31:08 (ID: 100110783) Report Abuse |
|
I'd be a bit leery of the low strength in the secondary. Nothing worse than having your safety blow a tackle and watching a guy with 35 speed run for an 80 yard touchdown... If you do put him in the secondary, just make sure to really overcompensate with the Tackle training.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-08-02 07:17:17 (ID: 100110793) Report Abuse |
|
punch drunk wrote:
Honestly - the QB must be a 50 is a myth as far as I'm concerned. 40 and above is absolutely fine. I would prefer his strength a little higher for QB. Use him (or sell) as a WR. His speed is
Or convert him to a free safety if you need one. I agree, 50 INT at QB isn't necessary, but it does affect the passing window, per Pete: Decision Window. That's enough for me to think this player isn't optimal for QB. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Stanford87
|
posted: 2017-08-03 11:17:31 (ID: 100110865) Report Abuse |
|
Thanks you guys
Unfortunately I have another question, I have these four players on my roster: Player A 45 Strength / 49 Speed 36.5 Int Track Star ( = 51 Speed) Player B 48.3 Strength / 44.6 Speed 50 Int Sure Tackler Player C 46 Strength / 46 Speed 48.6 Int Sure Tackler Player D 46.6 Strength / 47.4 Speed 43.5 Int Player E 44.6 Strength / 48.5 Speed 40.6 Int Now I have to split up this group in LBs and SFs and I don't know what to do. One question would be: How important is INT for OLBs? I'm aware that it is important for MLBs, but I don't know about the OLBs. Another question is whether the 44.6 SPD rating of Player B is enough to play MLB/SF? My first idea is: MLB - Player C (back-up) OLB - Player A (starter); Player D (back-up); Player E (back-up) SF - Player B (starter/back-up?) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-08-03 21:41:16 (ID: 100110886) Report Abuse |
|
Stanford87 wrote:
Thanks you guys
Unfortunately I have another question, I have these four players on my roster: Player A 45 Strength / 49 Speed 36.5 Int Track Star ( = 51 Speed) Player B 48.3 Strength / 44.6 Speed 50 Int Sure Tackler Player C 46 Strength / 46 Speed 48.6 Int Sure Tackler Player D 46.6 Strength / 47.4 Speed 43.5 Int Player E 44.6 Strength / 48.5 Speed 40.6 Int Now I have to split up this group in LBs and SFs and I don't know what to do. One question would be: How important is INT for OLBs? I'm aware that it is important for MLBs, but I don't know about the OLBs. Another question is whether the 44.6 SPD rating of Player B is enough to play MLB/SF? My first idea is: MLB - Player C (back-up) OLB - Player A (starter); Player D (back-up); Player E (back-up) SF - Player B (starter/back-up?) Can I assume that these guys are all developed with defensive skill sets? If not, the range of positions would be wider. Player A FS Player B MLB Player C SS or MLB2 Player D OLB Player E OLB I believe that player B can play anywhere on the defense. Yes, his speed is slightly below my own personal speed thresholds, but his strength, intelligence, and trait make him very attractive. When his positional skills get trained up, he should perform adequately. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2017-08-04 12:14:43 (ID: 100110914) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Player A sf/olb
Player B mlb Player C mlb/sf Player D olb Player E olb Last edited on 2017-08-04 12:15:35 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Skoum
|
posted: 2017-08-17 18:46:07 (ID: 100111867) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse |
|
Ok where would you make this guy play to get the best out of his crazy salary ?
I know he looks like a perfect OLB (he plays OLB), but I am wondering if he would not be more impactul at CB1. ? I am tired of seing my CBs missing tackles. I feel it's a pity to primarily "only" use it as a pass rusher, but I am not sure how heavily are OLB's involved in the passing game ? I have the feeling they are only competing against TE's on passing plays or backing up missed tackles by CB's. Although his high strength does help against rushing plays I guess. SPEED : 49 STR : 48 AGI : 49 INT : 41 VIS : 50 POS : 50 TACK : 50 EXP : 5* So, CB or OLB ? Last edited on 2017-08-17 19:15:00 by Skoum |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 183 184 185 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / What to do with this guy thread... | |
