no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / N00b Question Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 379 380 381 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
nathanialblood
|
posted: 2017-03-14 01:25:17 (ID: 100100173) Report Abuse |
|
Rock777 wrote:
BTW, 0.9 only works near the end of the season. The players will stick to their guns more at the start of the season. fair enough I should probably wait anyway I need to see how 1.1 treats me |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-14 06:55:38 (ID: 100100184) Report Abuse | |
|
The player does calculate his likely progress into his demands.
So if you do the contract talks at the end of the season, they have almost no progress until the end of the season to add and the formular with 0.9 of the estimated does work very well. If you do the talks beginning of the season you have to add those 10-15 skill points on top, calculate the estimated wage by yourself and then likely 0.9 of this is a good value. That's the reason I do it always at the end of the season. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-14 12:47:21 (ID: 100100200) Report Abuse | |
|
The 0.9 approximation works for me at the beginning of the season too.
I think that 0.9 is not stritcly valid in every case, but it is a reliable guess in most cases. It is a valid hypothesis for 1+1 year contracts, of course. If you wanto to propose longer contracts (1+2 years or more) the amount to pay is an higher multiplier (for sure above 1, but I couldn't find a valid rule of thumb here) of the current wages, because you have to pay the player's perspective at mid-long term. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-14 14:14:25 (ID: 100100204) Report Abuse | |
|
Yashin wrote:
The 0.9 approximation works for me at the beginning of the season too. I think that 0.9 is not stritcly valid in every case, but it is a reliable guess in most cases. It is a valid hypothesis for 1+1 year contracts, of course. If you wanto to propose longer contracts (1+2 years or more) the amount to pay is an higher multiplier (for sure above 1, but I couldn't find a valid rule of thumb here) of the current wages, because you have to pay the player's perspective at mid-long term. *0.95 for 1+2 years has worked for me at the beginning of seasons for quite a while now included 50 int LB's so give it a go  
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hollyhh2000
|
posted: 2017-03-14 14:22:10 (ID: 100100205) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
dell_g wrote:
Yashin wrote:
The 0.9 approximation works for me at the beginning of the season too. I think that 0.9 is not stritcly valid in every case, but it is a reliable guess in most cases. It is a valid hypothesis for 1+1 year contracts, of course. If you wanto to propose longer contracts (1+2 years or more) the amount to pay is an higher multiplier (for sure above 1, but I couldn't find a valid rule of thumb here) of the current wages, because you have to pay the player's perspective at mid-long term. *0.95 for 1+2 years has worked for me at the beginning of seasons for quite a while now included 50 int LB's so give it a go
int plays a role in his basic demand. The skill to watch is TW for contract negs (makes sense as more TW = more skills during the contract duration) 0.95 works for me up to TW43 for 1+2 at the beginning of the season TW in the 30ies even 0.92 Last edited on 2017-03-14 14:22:31 by hollyhh2000 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-14 14:26:35 (ID: 100100206) Report Abuse | |
|
hollyhh2000 wrote:
dell_g wrote:
Yashin wrote:
The 0.9 approximation works for me at the beginning of the season too. I think that 0.9 is not stritcly valid in every case, but it is a reliable guess in most cases. It is a valid hypothesis for 1+1 year contracts, of course. If you wanto to propose longer contracts (1+2 years or more) the amount to pay is an higher multiplier (for sure above 1, but I couldn't find a valid rule of thumb here) of the current wages, because you have to pay the player's perspective at mid-long term. *0.95 for 1+2 years has worked for me at the beginning of seasons for quite a while now included 50 int LB's so give it a go
int plays a role in his basic demand. The skill to watch is TW for contract negs (makes sense as more TW = more skills during the contract duration) 0.95 works for me up to TW43 for 1+2 at the beginning of the season TW in the 30ies even 0.92 Good point I've not got a lot of 40+ TW's so I've not come across this yet |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-14 20:52:18 (ID: 100100244) Report Abuse | |
|
Yashin wrote:
Sharkn20 wrote:
Anywhere were we can check when am I picking in the Draft order?? (Before the Draft) In the Team>Draft Board menu Above the date there is a phrase between horizontal lines saying : Without taking playoffs into account, it seems you are drafting in rounds: X, 32+X and 64+X Bugger me, I've never noticed that before. No wonder I'm sh@te at this game.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sharkn20
|
posted: 2017-03-14 21:16:23 (ID: 100100248) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
What country do we have to mark when we decide tto buy a supporter account?? The one from where we created the account? The one that we are playing in? Or can we choose the one with less taxes?? I want to pay for RZA but not to the Government
 Last edited on 2017-03-14 21:16:52 by Sharkn20 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lamba
|
posted: 2017-03-15 10:41:59 (ID: 100100327) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Stanford87
|
posted: 2017-03-15 11:20:29 (ID: 100100337) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
Lamba wrote:
Is there a way to see the entire draft? I'm thrilled with my 1st round pick, but I can't remember if he was like 3rd or 12th on my board (drafted 13th). Below the list of the remaining draftees is a button called "reveal all picks at once" (edit: it is actually called "reveal result all at once") You had pick #13 and the player you got was ranked #1 on your draft board. Last edited on 2017-03-15 11:21:58 by Stanford87 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 379 380 381 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / N00b Question | |
