Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Thunder / Thunder 1.1 Season 10 Search Forum
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  15  16 17  >   >|  
Poster Message
wiesengrund
posted: 2013-12-10 14:48:55 (ID: 100015903) Report Abuse
Oh enough with the kuschelfest you two! it's not like buddy wasn't building his team for years to force opponents to play mistake-free football in every aspect to have a chance. And it's not like it isn't a coaching decision to put a 27 tack guy as your primary G. Sure the engine needs tweaking, but you guys make it sound like pete decided that game. Give the players some credit, I feel the need to start an atheist movement here...

Last edited on 2013-12-10 14:50:14 by wiesengrund

Quote   Reply   Edit  
SimKon
posted: 2013-12-10 17:16:42 (ID: 100015929) Report Abuse
So, your criticism is that I put my best CB and a 49 Speed and strength monster at gunner?
Quote   Reply   Edit  
wiesengrund
posted: 2013-12-10 17:22:05 (ID: 100015931) Report Abuse
I didn't criticise, I'm just saying, pete didn't put them there. And the sure tackler is "fine" (he'd be a G#2-4 on my depth Chart too) but we all know in a CC game "fine" maybe isn't good enough, and it's not pete's fault that his skills are below 30. All I'm saying is, If I put him on the Gunner spot and I lose a game because of him, it's not just a set of circumstances that are out of our control that decided that. And that's the vibe I got from all this engine talk.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
hosh13
posted: 2013-12-10 17:28:00 (ID: 100015932) Report Abuse
But it is a very broken part of the game - there are supposed to be another 8 players between the 2 Gs and the punter!

Come to think of it, in my game vs E Logic, he probably should have counted himself lucky that his punter made 2 tackles!
Quote   Reply   Edit  
SimKon
posted: 2013-12-10 17:28:24 (ID: 100015933) Report Abuse
I stand by my words. The ST are too fluky.
I didn't say and did by no means try to implicate I lost because of them.
My gameplan was crap.

Last edited on 2013-12-10 17:29:11 by SimKon

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Buddy Ryan
posted: 2013-12-17 11:38:37 (ID: 100016569) Report Abuse
good luck to Notsch! not that you need it I just hope my Bears can keep it somewhat interesting...
Quote   Reply   Edit  
SimKon
posted: 2013-12-17 12:27:29 (ID: 100016572) Report Abuse
Buddy Ryan wrote:
good luck to Notsch! not that you need it I just hope my Bears can keep it somewhat interesting...


"somewhat interesting" ...
Quote   Reply   Edit  
wiesengrund
posted: 2013-12-17 12:31:58 (ID: 100016573) Report Abuse
I guess that qualifies as "intersting", yes.

What a game.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
notsch
posted: 2013-12-17 12:58:26 (ID: 100016574) Report Abuse
wiesengrund wrote:
I guess that qualifies as "intersting", yes.

What a game.



Yeah, without a working d# you cannot win anything

BORING GAME

No serious, my guys were obviously simply not prepared for that storming Bears team today...those guys really wanted that win...mine not

Congratz to the Bears, stellar performance!
Those long seasons of working finally payed off

The king is dead, long live the king

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Buddy Ryan
posted: 2013-12-17 13:09:42 (ID: 100016575) Report Abuse
thx guys! there were some lucky breaks involved, but I guess my offense really wanted to play today still think I needed everything to go right to beat Notsch, and it certainly did

Last edited on 2013-12-17 13:31:51 by Buddy Ryan

Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  15  16 17  >   >|  
Main / Thunder / Thunder 1.1 Season 10