no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Galaxy / Galaxy 1.1 - Game of the Week Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-11-18 09:42:27 (ID: 68864) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
But it will be a close game if both owners make it to bring their #1 guys on the field. Play like only 5 OL and exploit the "low effect of fatique anomaly" 
I now it is there but i wont do it, because i still hope to find engnie that works fine and balance with round player and logical effects of usage, i patient, i wait :look patient at watch smiley: Last edited on 2012-11-18 09:46:05 by Turtlemania |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-11-18 11:02:31 (ID: 68867) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
I would say the Turtles have a small disadvantage versus the Stars and therefore the Turtles will lose. And finally, the Stars play at home... But it will be a close game if both owners make it to bring their #1 guys on the field. Thanks, Pete, for your confidence in me. I wonder what this small disadvantage might be? I've been beaten twice by Turtles. However, this is the first time I'm having the feeling I can make something happen against the dirty Turtles. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-11-18 11:30:25 (ID: 68871) Report Abuse |
|
Toni Gorilla wrote:the dirty Turtles.
Wow now we are dirty, but on the other hand we are one of the few teams play this game as intention is to be, by avoid use any exploit and line up team as in real life a team would make But i do not take it as offense - lets have a good game and hope for some interesting calculation results  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-11-18 12:04:53 (ID: 68873) Report Abuse | |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Toni Gorilla wrote:the dirty Turtles.
Wow now we are dirty, but on the other hand we are one of the few teams play this game as intention is to be, by avoid use any exploit and line up team as in real life a team would make But i do not take it as offense - lets have a good game and hope for some interesting calculation results I play against the Stars every Friday and Toni titled my team with "nasty Bandits". I don´t see this as an insult, but rather see it as praise and encouragement. So I take it that "dirty Turtles" goes in the same direction as "nasty Bandits". |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-11-18 14:18:37 (ID: 68879) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Toni Gorilla wrote:the dirty Turtles.
Wow now we are dirty, but on the other hand we are one of the few teams play this game as intention is to be, by avoid use any exploit and line up team as in real life a team would make But i do not take it as offense - lets have a good game and hope for some interesting calculation results I never intend to be offensive, hands down. When a Pawn Star calls someone "dirty" it's actually a compliment. (I wish the wife was a bit dirty...) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-11-20 20:04:18 (ID: 69200) Report Abuse |
|
Luck win for Turtles, very close game.
Could not get anything on ground, but a few pass was solid and enough. Good Game Toni, maybe next time i should change playbook  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-11-20 20:20:14 (ID: 69206) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Luck win for Turtles, very close game. Could not get anything on ground, but a few pass was solid and enough. Good Game Toni, maybe next time i should change playbook Thanks Turtle, a close game indeed. Perhaps next time I will finally beat you. I think my playbook was set out quite nicely in preparation for you. Unfortunately for me, it didn't translate into more points.. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-11-20 23:29:55 (ID: 69257) Report Abuse | |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
But it will be a close game if both owners make it to bring their #1 guys on the field. Play like only 5 OL and exploit the "low effect of fatique anomaly"
I now it is there but i wont do it, because i still hope to find engnie that works fine and balance with round player and logical effects of usage, i patient, i wait :look patient at watch smiley: Which NFL teams actually rotate their Offensive Linemen? Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-11-21 23:36:16 (ID: 69449) Report Abuse |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
But it will be a close game if both owners make it to bring their #1 guys on the field. Play like only 5 OL and exploit the "low effect of fatique anomaly"
I now it is there but i wont do it, because i still hope to find engnie that works fine and balance with round player and logical effects of usage, i patient, i wait :look patient at watch smiley: Which NFL teams actually rotate their Offensive Linemen? Steve SD Blitz Other than injury, NONE! This is one of my main issues. My backup OL and backup QB should almost never play. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-11-22 05:03:26 (ID: 69461) Report Abuse |
|
slider6 wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
Which NFL teams actually rotate their Offensive Linemen? Steve SD Blitz Other than injury, NONE! This is one of my main issues. Well you are both correct and this is not irony! So ok im am turned now and i think it is correct everything here too Last edited on 2012-11-22 05:04:17 by Turtlemania |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Galaxy / Galaxy 1.1 - Game of the Week | |
