no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Formations to add - read the very first post before you post anything Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 17 18 19 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2017-06-15 09:12:39 (ID: 100108037) Report Abuse |
|
3-3-5 Spread
DEL DER NT MLB OLBR OLBL CBR CBR2 CBL CBL2 SSC Against SG4WR You can give more pressure to the QB. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2017-06-15 09:14:27 (ID: 100108038) Report Abuse |
|
3-3-5 Spread Deep
DEL DER NT MLB OLBR OLBL CBR CBR2 CBL CBL2 FSC Against SG4WR You can give more pressure to the QB. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2017-06-15 09:16:59 (ID: 100108039) Report Abuse |
|
4-3-4 Spread
DEL DER DTL DTR MLB OLBR OLBL CBR CBR2 CBL CBL2 Against SG4WR You can give more pressure to the QB. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2018-06-23 12:26:36 (ID: 100129944) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
Defense 4-3-4 (2FS)
der del dtr dtl mlb olbr olbl cbr cbl fsr fsl Since the 4-3-4 "standard" seems (in my experience) weak to passage route on sides, this little variant could give a further chance to counter tactics that rely on high number of WRs and continuous left/right pass actions. I see that it is a long time since additional tactics are discussed... I hope there is still margin for this kind of proposals. Last edited on 2018-06-23 12:29:35 by Yashin |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2018-06-28 10:13:16 (ID: 100130085) Report Abuse | |
|
OK, still I don't think it would make a huge difference, since the SS acts kind of a FS in this formations once it comes to deeper passes.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2018-06-28 14:11:47 (ID: 100130099) Report Abuse | |
|
Any chance that the 2 Pistol Offense formations (On page 13) and the 4-2-5 and 3-2-6 Defensive formations that Oakbark commented on (On page 14) will be introduced?
  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2018-06-28 17:46:04 (ID: 100130107) Report Abuse | |
|
I will review these formations suggestions once the engine works as expected
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2018-06-28 19:18:10 (ID: 100130110) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
pete wrote:
OK, still I don't think it would make a huge difference, since the SS acts kind of a FS in this formations once it comes to deeper passes. I often use 3-4-4 and I cannot remember a single tackle by the SS after a pass completion. My first string SS has 0 interceptions in 9 seasons (more than 5000 plays). Probably it's something about my team composition, but I never had the impression that SS had any active action when the opponent throws the ball. Last edited on 2018-06-28 19:19:53 by Yashin |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
badgers
|
posted: 2018-08-17 19:07:41 (ID: 100131953) Report Abuse |
|
Singleback Empty
QB OTL OTR OGL OGR OC WRL WRL2 WRR TER HBR QB starts out under center HBR, TER, and WRR line up in a trips formation 1-2.5 yards to the right of the OTR (the HBR being closest to OTR, TER in middle, and WRR on outside). The HBR and TER line up as receivers. WRL lines up in normal wide position on left side WRL2 lines up in normal slot position on left side Pass heavy formation with the ability to add some HB runs if he motions into the backfield before the snap. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sverngolld
|
posted: 2018-11-23 18:42:45 (ID: 100134675) Report Abuse |
|
4-2-5 on defense
DE,DL,DL,DE MLB,MLB CB SS FS CB |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 17 18 19 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Formations to add - read the very first post before you post anything | |
