no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / N00b Question Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 379 380 381 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2016-08-02 12:09:01 (ID: 100082581) Report Abuse |
|
anderton46 wrote:
I notice my OG's get a lot less action than my OT's. So do most people stick their best OL's at Tackle? Yes. Tackles are the only OL that block against 3, 4 and 5 DL fronts. Guards don't block against 3 DL fronts and Centers don't block against 4 DL fronts. Actually, let me rephrase this. Pete said that the blocking calculation depends on the entire OL so presumably all 5 OL matter on each and every play. So in reality, Guards don't get blocks or missed blocks against 3 DL fronts but they probably still help the overall blocking of your entire OL. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
anderton46
|
posted: 2016-08-02 12:21:22 (ID: 100082582) Report Abuse |
|
Meitheisman wrote:
anderton46 wrote:
I notice my OG's get a lot less action than my OT's. So do most people stick their best OL's at Tackle? Yes. Tackles are the only OL that block against 3, 4 and 5 DL fronts. Guards don't block against 3 DL fronts and Centers don't block against 4 DL fronts. Actually, let me rephrase this. Pete said that the blocking calculation depends on the entire OL so presumably all 5 OL matter on each and every play. So in reality, Guards don't get blocks or missed blocks against 3 DL fronts but they probably still help the overall blocking of your entire OL. Ah that makes sense as the last guy I played used mainly 3 DL fronts. Thanks for this tip, very handy  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-08-02 12:24:20 (ID: 100082583) Report Abuse | |
|
Meitheisman wrote:
anderton46 wrote:
I notice my OG's get a lot less action than my OT's. So do most people stick their best OL's at Tackle? Yes. Tackles are the only OL that block against 3, 4 and 5 DL fronts. Guards don't block against 3 DL fronts and Centers don't block against 4 DL fronts. Actually, let me rephrase this. Pete said that the blocking calculation depends on the entire OL so presumably all 5 OL matter on each and every play. So in reality, Guards don't get blocks or missed blocks against 3 DL fronts but they probably still help the overall blocking of your entire OL. The same is valid for DL btw, and...each of these Lineman (O + D) acts with his "neighbor" left and right of him. So saying the C is not blocking on 4 DL lines is basically wrong somehow...his abilities help the Guards left and right of him. This is important! So without your add-on it would be real wrong. People miss this very often Last edited on 2016-08-02 12:25:07 by pete |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2016-08-02 12:27:04 (ID: 100082584) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
anderton46 wrote:
I notice my OG's get a lot less action than my OT's. So do most people stick their best OL's at Tackle? Yes. Tackles are the only OL that block against 3, 4 and 5 DL fronts. Guards don't block against 3 DL fronts and Centers don't block against 4 DL fronts. Actually, let me rephrase this. Pete said that the blocking calculation depends on the entire OL so presumably all 5 OL matter on each and every play. So in reality, Guards don't get blocks or missed blocks against 3 DL fronts but they probably still help the overall blocking of your entire OL. The same is valid for DL btw, and...each of these Lineman (O + D) acts with his "neighbor" left and right of him. So saying the C is not blocking on 4 DL lines is basically wrong somehow...his abilities help the Guards left and right of him. This is important! So without your add-on it would be real wrong. People miss this very often Thanks for the clarification  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-08-14 14:41:54 (ID: 100083355) Report Abuse | |
|
I see a 35 yo on the TM. How is that possible? I thought it was auto retire @36
35 year old So I guess some will play when they are 36. ? Last edited on 2016-08-14 14:43:20 by punch drunk |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-08-14 15:42:39 (ID: 100083356) Report Abuse | |
|
as mentioned many times, there is no hard cap on the players age for retiring. But from 36, is is quite common for the guys to retire...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2016-08-16 09:04:59 (ID: 100083434) Report Abuse |
|
Re importing an exported PB:
"This will create a TXT file. Just store the file on your hard disc. Do never ever edit the file, this could result in broken formatting, which causes a loss of your rules." Can I change the file name though without risking a loss of rules? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-08-16 09:48:19 (ID: 100083443) Report Abuse | |
|
I've renamed the .txt file and it has been loaded correctly.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2016-08-16 22:34:36 (ID: 100083498) Report Abuse | |
|
You can also edit your PB file (you are lazy and you have many lines, if you want to delete some of them).
Once you have opened the file, don't forget to read this first : "Do never ever edit this file, this will result in broken format of it and you won't be able to import" |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Kruzhnash
|
posted: 2016-08-19 06:29:31 (ID: 100083610) Report Abuse |
|
A short question: at which rate is experience gained? I know I read it somewhere but I couldn't find it with the search function.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 379 380 381 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / N00b Question | |
