no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / N00b Question Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 379 380 381 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2019-03-10 18:38:48 (ID: 100137472) Report Abuse | |
|
pete wrote:
Sure this would be right? I am not sure of anything. 
Just would like to find a way to defined better the top 3 OL of our leagues. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2019-03-26 15:01:04 (ID: 100137967) Report Abuse |
|
is the following statement correct?
Firing a player is always cheaper than paying them until the end of their contract. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
PJRAVENS
|
posted: 2019-03-26 15:56:58 (ID: 100137970) Report Abuse |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
is the following statement correct? Firing a player is always cheaper than paying them until the end of their contract. From the manual "If you plan to fire a player and his contract is valid, he will ask you for some extra money, based on the contract amount and duration." so seems correct If not I guess the manual should say somenthing like this "If you plan to fire a player and his contract is valid, you have to pay the whole amount of the remaining salary" I have just tryed to cut a player the penalty is 2 tournover amount so I would save a turnover |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-27 06:40:58 (ID: 100138001) Report Abuse | |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
is the following statement correct? Firing a player is always cheaper than paying them until the end of their contract. Yes, but the key word is 'end of contract'. I usually only fire when less than a season is left on the contract, otherwise I try to sell. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2019-03-27 16:02:18 (ID: 100138020) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
Cheesehead wrote:
is the following statement correct? Firing a player is always cheaper than paying them until the end of their contract. Yes, but the key word is 'end of contract'. I usually only fire when less than a season is left on the contract, otherwise I try to sell. ... and if you can sell that's even cheaper then firing! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
jetto
|
posted: 2019-03-27 16:58:51 (ID: 100138023) Report Abuse |
|
Yes, I also calculated firing is cheaper than paying the remaining contract... But selling would be the best option...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-27 23:00:00 (ID: 100138035) Report Abuse | |
|
Cheesehead wrote:
is the following statement correct? Firing a player is always cheaper than paying him until the end of his contract. I wouldn't say it's "cheaper". Paying for someone who is not in your team can't be cheaper than paying someone who is in your team. Yes, at deadline you will have paid less ; it costs less. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
158.3
|
posted: 2019-03-30 20:02:30 (ID: 100138114) Report Abuse |
|
For example
Claymore 2 League - 3 human teams, 29 bot teams Admirals 2 League - no bots How will the site administration resolve this unbalance ? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2019-03-30 22:14:54 (ID: 100138118) Report Abuse | |
|
How could I? Forcing teams not to join admirals?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2019-03-31 12:41:03 (ID: 100138153) Report Abuse |
|
I think a it would indeed be better for the game if each region had a similar number of managers. In Fire 1 we had 7 bots to begin S33 for example so barely 30 active teams while some regions have double that number.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 379 380 381 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / N00b Question | |
