no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Options of using 4-3-3 75% blitz against the run? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2021-03-28 01:37:57 (ID: 100158074) Report Abuse | |
|
How effective is 4-3-3 75% blitz against the run?
Assuming you think the other team might be running 30-40% so you want to blitz the QB, but also stuff the run. Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2021-03-28 03:05:57 (ID: 100158075) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
How effective is 4-3-3 75% blitz against the run? Assuming you think the other team might be running 30-40% so you want to blitz the QB, but also stuff the run. Steve SD Blitz Probably really ineffective since you only have 10 players on the field!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2021-03-28 06:09:44 (ID: 100158076) Report Abuse | |
|
Rufio13 wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
How effective is 4-3-3 75% blitz against the run? Assuming you think the other team might be running 30-40% so you want to blitz the QB, but also stuff the run. Steve SD Blitz Probably really ineffective since you only have 10 players on the field! Ack...I meant 4-4-3. Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2021-03-28 07:37:18 (ID: 100158080) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Rufio13 wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
How effective is 4-3-3 75% blitz against the run? Assuming you think the other team might be running 30-40% so you want to blitz the QB, but also stuff the run. Steve SD Blitz Probably really ineffective since you only have 10 players on the field! Ack...I meant 4-4-3. Steve SD Blitz Like I seemingly did when you got that game ending touchdown! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
PJRAVENS
|
posted: 2021-03-28 07:41:47 (ID: 100158082) Report Abuse |
|
Can we assume that in rushing plays the LB blitz goes the same for the QB ignoring the ball carrier?
I can see ball carriers tackled and fumble forced only by blitzing SF in my stats. If this is true, rushing outside, the RBs/FBs have at disposal a potential "hole", the one left by the blitzing OLB. In addition 4-4-3 doesn't have a SS. The probability shoud be 2/4 OLB blitz x 1/2 rush in the hole direction = 25% Having two MLB one of them it will be always ready to counter the rush in the middle. But the main question is... do the DLs act in the same way in case of blitz order, or without blitzing against the rush the DLs as a whole are more effective? looking forward for all of you opinions. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
wiesengrund
|
posted: 2021-03-28 07:45:02 (ID: 100158083) Report Abuse |
|
My experience is this is really unstable, at least with the player types I tend to prefer.
You end up being big play susceptible due to the lack of DBs, But the run defense is weakened by the blitzer not having gap integrity. It did seem to me that the blitzer has a higher chance of causing a fumble while flying by the runner, but not enough to overcome the basic "worst of both worlds" instability. And might just be small sample size noise. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Options of using 4-3-3 75% blitz against the run? | |
