no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / Blitzing Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 7 8 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-03 16:43:08 (ID: 15275) |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Maybe the confusion has more to do with the description of Fearsome: Fearsome Quarterbacks are scared just by this player lining up across from them. Fearsome gives a 5% chance to cause the QB to feel hurry pressure when this player is blitzing, valid for DL or LB This sort of implies that the only benefit from Fearsome occurs while blitzing. 1. Not sure if there are additional benefits. 2. Or if DEs with fearsome will get this bonus for every pass pass as they are always blitzing. Steve SD Blitz No, the confusion is based on two different words for the same thing...Blitzing by LB/SF and "Blitzing" by DE results in the same thing, and is the same style that you have to write the simulation for it. Don't worry - I am always happy to learn something additional. The only thing that really annoys me are some picky comments by a certain german board member... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2011-11-03 17:04:19 (ID: 15279) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
The only thing that really annoys me are some picky comments by a certain german board member...  you do not like me?
Anyway - as i write always: good thing is you do improve But fact is that wording is often confusing and produces questions like this happens here with blitzing again. So even for me its hard to follow and know then what is actual status and i stopped asking more deep into the details and the fearsome trait is a good example to ask more deep about working of traits and so on. But oddball said in past i or we have to experiment and get feeling so i try to get feeling And what is wrong with my comments? As i write i was wondering which is not allowed to wonder in world today? Anyway: clients sometimes are bad and you can only hope they go away one day from by own or just stop complain and there is hope with game improves  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-14 07:59:42 (ID: 16527) |
|
A new version of blitzing was uploaded, and activated for Friendlies. Please check your games.
Where we are now: 1.) The DEs go heavily for Breakthroughs, as long as they don't get blocked by the OLs 2.) The LB/SF go for blitzing based on Playbooksettings 3.) better playbyplay, DEs will have "Breakthroughs", while LB/SF will have "Blitzes" What's missing: 1.) No collision check on rush with the Rusher if rush was expected by the D 2.) No check if rush/pass is expected at all. The DE/LB/SF should try to find the HB/FB route and go for the rush tackle. At the moment they will attack the QB |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Laudis
|
posted: 2011-11-14 08:11:04 (ID: 16528) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
A new version of blitzing was uploaded, and activated for Friendlies. Please check your games. Where we are now: 1.) The DEs go heavily for Breakthroughs, as long as they don't get blocked by the OLs 2.) The LB/SF go for blitzing based on Playbooksettings 3.) better playbyplay, DEs will have "Breakthroughs", while LB/SF will have "Blitzes" What's missing: 1.) No collision check on rush with the Rusher if rush was expected by the D 2.) No check if rush/pass is expected at all. The DE/LB/SF should try to find the HB/FB route and go for the rush tackle. At the moment they will attack the QB Let make the decision if to breakthrough based on Int+Exp of MLB (he adviced) or on inteligence+experience of DE. / so if pass expected / go for it, otherwise look for rusher. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-14 08:23:16 (ID: 16529) |
|
It is just a matter of time if I can add this for this offseasons u p d a t e or not. What we have now could go online on the season rollover for all matches.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-11-14 14:05:39 (ID: 16543) Report Abuse |
|
Would be sacks of DT/NT possible in the future, when the OL missed the block?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-14 14:47:52 (ID: 16544) |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Would be sacks of DT/NT possible in the future, when the OL missed the block? Not for season 2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2011-11-14 16:27:50 (ID: 16548) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
A new version of blitzing was uploaded, and activated for Friendlies. Please check your games. Where we are now: 1.) The DEs go heavily for Breakthroughs, as long as they don't get blocked by the OLs 2.) The LB/SF go for blitzing based on Playbooksettings 3.) better playbyplay, DEs will have "Breakthroughs", while LB/SF will have "Blitzes" What's missing: 1.) No collision check on rush with the Rusher if rush was expected by the D 2.) No check if rush/pass is expected at all. The DE/LB/SF should try to find the HB/FB route and go for the rush tackle. At the moment they will attack the QB Sounds good for me. Only a question: why the blitzes have a limit? Why can I blitz only 15% of the snaps? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-14 16:59:14 (ID: 16549) |
|
panoramix wrote:
Admin wrote:
A new version of blitzing was uploaded, and activated for Friendlies. Please check your games. Where we are now: 1.) The DEs go heavily for Breakthroughs, as long as they don't get blocked by the OLs 2.) The LB/SF go for blitzing based on Playbooksettings 3.) better playbyplay, DEs will have "Breakthroughs", while LB/SF will have "Blitzes" What's missing: 1.) No collision check on rush with the Rusher if rush was expected by the D 2.) No check if rush/pass is expected at all. The DE/LB/SF should try to find the HB/FB route and go for the rush tackle. At the moment they will attack the QB Sounds good for me. Only a question: why the blitzes have a limit? Why can I blitz only 15% of the snaps? This is question of balancing and fairness. I don't like to see a match of a strong vs a weak team where the strong team goes for 100% blitzes. Such restrictions are necessary, since we do not act live versus the other, and therefore we can't react - like a coach would do |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
kyoshuke
|
posted: 2011-11-14 21:13:21 (ID: 16600) Report Abuse |
|
Can you highlight the Blitz plays on our Games?
I'm too lazy to read the full commentary....  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 7 8 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / Blitzing | |
