no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Bug reporting / Sack for FS Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-12-23 16:44:47 (ID: 20718) Report Abuse |
|
I had a sack from my FS, but it was now written in the play-by-play that the FS goes for a blitz:
5:41 1 and 10 to go on opp 37, Braulio Hernández (OC) snaps the ball to Pablo Romero (QB), Pablo Romero (QB) selected Eugenio Ramírez (WR/L) as target, James Edwards (DE/R) breaks through the line, Pablo Romero (QB) gets sacked by Edwyn East (FS/R), 7 yards for loss (Wishbone vs. 3-4-4) Normaly, when a SF blitz: 6:42 1 and 10 to go on own 38, Manfred Neumann (OC) snaps the ball to Vinzenz Schuster (QB), Ricardo Weber (HB/C) gets the ball, he starts running over the left end, Matthew Alexander (DE/R) breaks through, Dominic Baker (SS/L) goes for the blitz, Tilo Lange (TE/R) blocks, Erhardt Weber (TE/L) blocks, James Edwards (DE/L) brings Ricardo Weber (HB/C) down, nice tackle, forward progress: no gain (Big I formation vs. 3-4-4) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-23 16:46:47 (ID: 20719) |
|
why do you think this is a bug?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-12-23 16:50:57 (ID: 20720) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
I had a sack from my FS, but it was now written in the play-by-play that the FS goes for a blitz: 5:41 1 and 10 to go on opp 37, Braulio Hernández (OC) snaps the ball to Pablo Romero (QB), Pablo Romero (QB) selected Eugenio Ramírez (WR/L) as target, James Edwards (DE/R) breaks through the line, Pablo Romero (QB) gets sacked by Edwyn East (FS/R), 7 yards for loss (Wishbone vs. 3-4-4) 2 Possibilities: 1.) The FS got a sack without blitzing (may be a bug) 2.) FS goes for a blitz, but it is not written in the play-by-play (missing or not wanted) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-12-23 16:58:50 (ID: 20721) Report Abuse |
|
Here an example from my actual game, how I expected the play-by-play
2:51 1 and 10 to go on 50, Braulio Hernández (OC) snaps the ball to Pablo Romero (QB), Pablo Romero (QB) selected Eugenio Ramírez (WR/L) as target, Dominic Baker (SS/L) goes for the blitz, Pablo Romero (QB) gets sacked by Dominic Baker (SS/L), 8 yards for loss (Wishbone vs. 3-4-4) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-24 10:38:30 (ID: 20787) |
|
On that play there was a heavy attack by DE and SF, this is why the engine is not mentioning both to break through. We could change that. However, the SF finally was the one that "killed" the QB
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-12-24 10:42:40 (ID: 20788) Report Abuse |
|
But I have a example from the same match with a blitz from DE and SF and both were mentioned in the play-by-play:
8:37 2 and 5 to go on own 31, Vicente Miranda (OC) snaps the ball to Adolfo Romero (QB), who hands off to Oliver Guzmán (HB/C), this seems to be a run over the right guard, James Edwards (DE/L) breaks through, Edwyn East (FS/R) goes for the blitz, Stacey Mccutcheon (TE/R) blocks, Oliver Guzmán (HB/C) tackled by Tevita Tahitu'a (MLB), forward progress: 7 yards, New first down (I-formation vs. 3-4-4) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-24 10:53:35 (ID: 20789) |
|
Yeap, the other example was a pass, different behavior...it seems to be confusing...maybe too much Guinness when I wrote that stuff
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-12-24 10:59:24 (ID: 20791) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Yeap, the other example was a pass, different behavior...it seems to be confusing...maybe too much Guinness when I wrote that stuff Now I got it. A small difference cause much confusion for me. Sorry for the additional work at Christmas. Cheers  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-24 11:03:54 (ID: 20792) |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Admin wrote:
Yeap, the other example was a pass, different behavior...it seems to be confusing...maybe too much Guinness when I wrote that stuff Now I got it. A small difference cause much confusion for me. Sorry for the additional work at Christmas. Cheers No problem,...just waiting for Santa, with the laptop in my hands 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Bug reporting / Sack for FS | |
