no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Top100-Player trades Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-02-23 15:56:43 (ID: 29444) Report Abuse |
|
The headline is the suggestion.
We saw a lot of expensive transfers and it would be nice to fix them in a ranking for all-time. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2012-02-23 15:58:24 (ID: 29445) Report Abuse |
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-23 16:31:25 (ID: 29452) Report Abuse |
Will heat just up the market and it could mislead new managers that players sold for gazillions really was worth it - instead someone should tell them truth that e.g. turtles are dumb |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-02-23 16:37:55 (ID: 29454) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Will heat just up the market and it could mislead new managers that players sold for gazillions really was worth it - instead someone should tell them truth that e.g. turtles are dumb Or a view on at the ranking can reduce the doubts to sell a good player if you have huge financial troubles. There are allways two sides of a medal. Last edited on 2012-02-23 16:38:09 by Buffalo |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-23 16:44:42 (ID: 29455) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
Will heat just up the market and it could mislead new managers that players sold for gazillions really was worth it - instead someone should tell them truth that e.g. turtles are dumb Or a view on at the ranking can reduce the doubts to sell a good player if you have huge financial troubles. There are allways two sides of a medal. a) The goal is that "we" help users not to come into financial trouble b) This view could mislead managers to sell player although they dont really need to sell a player! I said it earlier today: no one of the new teams needs to sell player to catch up - they harm themselves if they do sell "jewelry" c) All existent Rankings are "fluff" (heard this word here first these days and like it)  - maybe only the salary one is interestingLast edited on 2012-02-23 16:45:40 by Turtlemania |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-02-23 16:52:39 (ID: 29459) Report Abuse |
|
Well you can already look at the top 10 transfers of the week every week since the beginning. You can also look at the top 10 contracts reached each week since the beginning.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Laudis
|
posted: 2012-02-23 17:20:07 (ID: 29467) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
Well you can already look at the top 10 transfers of the week every week since the beginning. You can also look at the top 10 contracts reached each week since the beginning. where? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-02-23 17:20:37 (ID: 29470) |
|
Laudis wrote:
sfniner08 wrote:
Well you can already look at the top 10 transfers of the week every week since the beginning. You can also look at the top 10 contracts reached each week since the beginning. where? "Mag" |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-02-23 17:44:03 (ID: 29473) Report Abuse |
|
pretty cool, found it yesterday just messing around here waiting for the draft. I have one week where I had a top transfer. Down week as it was only 2 or 3 million. lol
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Top100-Player trades | |
