no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / A couple of suggestions^^ Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Newgate
|
posted: 2012-03-02 07:50:38 (ID: 30947) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
The system shouldn't set the minimum, because the value is totally depened on the needs of the managers. If all managers would have a bunch of kickers, nobody would pay much for a kicker on the market. So a calculated minimum could be way to high. And then what? Postions are different, needs are different and even skills have to be valued different than just adding them. Even a compare of two players is not simply possible based on skills, because one team is looking for a Backup and the other for a starter. So if then both players are equally skilled, the value for both managers are different. Sorry, but that concept need a lot of more rethinking. I know this need alot, but if all think about^^ then maybe we can create a concept. Your right about this, my thinking of the value is not perfect, because i don´t know the system exactly. And ofcourse every Manager thinks different about an player, but a solid scaffolding where all skills for a Player counts the same, would be nice, if he has the same number of skills, then he has the same price, even if he has different allocation of the skills, maybe he has 50 SP in speed and the other 35SP, but the same overall skill, then i think he has the same value or do you think different about this? I know a WR with high speed is better then a slower WR, but if the slower one,has better catching skill, then i think he is better, who needs a fast WR if he can´t catch the ball? How about the talent skill? if we count his in? if we have 2 WR with the same Skills and they both 19 years old, but the first one has 5* and the other maybe 3* then i think everybody would buy the 5* talent! Last edited on 2012-03-02 07:54:38 by Newgate |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-03-02 08:45:58 (ID: 30952) Report Abuse | |
|
Newgate wrote:
I know this need alot, but if all think about^^ then maybe we can create a concept. Your right about this, my thinking of the value is not perfect, because i don´t know the system exactly. And ofcourse every Manager thinks different about an player, but a solid scaffolding where all skills for a Player counts the same, would be nice, if he has the same number of skills, then he has the same price, even if he has different allocation of the skills, maybe he has 50 SP in speed and the other 35SP, but the same overall skill, then i think he has the same value or do you think different about this? I know a WR with high speed is better then a slower WR, but if the slower one,has better catching skill, then i think he is better, who needs a fast WR if he can´t catch the ball? I do think different, and so do others. This is where the personal value starts. Some like speedy receivers more than a surecatcher. Some may like the mix. This is a totally complicated thing. And as you can see, I'm the only one having a chat with you, so it seems, the others are not that interested in that topic. Sorry. How about the talent skill? if we count his in? if we have 2 WR with the same Skills and they both 19 years old, but the first one has 5* and the other maybe 3* then i think everybody would buy the 5* talent! Talent, Teamwork, traits ... how do you value that? Talent comes into play only when the player hits his skill highs, but a manager plans for several seasons, so yes, Talented guys will be higher valued. But how much depends on the managers. I think at the moment there are bigger fishes to catch. I can only see such system work if the economy is totally changed, which won't happen. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Newgate
|
posted: 2012-03-03 21:07:57 (ID: 31164) Report Abuse |
|
Your are right, but i think about it and i hope nobody is angry because i wrote so much
btw^^ i have new suggestions^^ how about implement a Transfer history for the player in his player details? And what do you thing about adding the current year he is playing Football? a draft player this year is a Rookie and the others 1 or 2 years pro? how they use in real nfl!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-03-03 21:10:31 (ID: 31165) Report Abuse |
|
Newgate wrote:
how about implement a Transfer history for the player in his player details? Is allready there: Player - Career stats |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Newgate
|
posted: 2012-03-03 21:13:31 (ID: 31166) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Newgate wrote:
how about implement a Transfer history for the player in his player details? Is allready there: Player - Career stats i didn´t know thx every day i learn more^^ |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-03-04 09:13:27 (ID: 31233) Report Abuse | |
|
Noboday is angry, when you are thinking.
But don't be disapointed when your ideas don't come true. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Newgate
|
posted: 2012-03-04 09:18:08 (ID: 31236) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
Noboday is angry, when you are thinking.
But don't be disapointed when your ideas don't come true. iam not disapointed i think its better when someone write an answer instead of no one. So what do you think about this R(ookie) and the other with this 1 year pro or so, how this is in real
i know this is something for the layout but this would be nice
and what about stats for the rookies? I know there is also a Hall of Fame, but when i look at it, i don´t find some for the Rookies |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-03-04 09:28:21 (ID: 31239) Report Abuse | |
|
Sounds like nice to have.
I don't know, if Peter has the data at that point. If he has, the rest is just display stuff. You should put this into clean writing and suggest this as new topic. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Newgate
|
posted: 2012-03-04 09:32:40 (ID: 31242) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
Sounds like nice to have. I don't know, if Peter has the data at that point. If he has, the rest is just display stuff. You should put this into clean writing and suggest this as new topic. Thx i write it today, but not jet^^ |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / A couple of suggestions^^ | |
