no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Bug reporting / Strange (wrong?) overall rating? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
notsch
|
posted: 2012-06-11 16:38:56 (ID: 44272) Report Abuse |
|
Just check my next game:
http://redzoneaction.org/football/index.php?page=yourteam&subpage=gamecenter&matchid=119349 In four of five cases the rating is better for my team. Only for rushing offense Slavia Pankrác is better (by 0,2 %). Why is his overall rating better than mine by 0,4 %? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-06-11 17:11:15 (ID: 44276) Report Abuse | |
|
It depends on the number of set positions as well. If he has no KR and G as example, his Special Team ranking becomes less weight in the overall...and vice versa. With the displayed numbers there is no way to calculate the team overall rating
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
notsch
|
posted: 2012-06-11 17:35:38 (ID: 44278) Report Abuse |
|
So you think the displayed values are correct?
I mean i got that with the weighting, but is it realistic that his 0,2 % edge in the running game leads to an 0,4 % overall advantage  Last edited on 2012-06-11 17:48:00 by notsch |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-06-11 17:49:14 (ID: 44279) Report Abuse | |
|
notsch wrote:
So you think the displayed values are correct? I mean i got that with the weighting, but is it realistic that his 0,2 % edge in the running game leads to a 0,4 % overall advantage Yes, because there are 14 positions OL QB WR TE RB FB DL LB CB SF K P G KR If there is no G as example, it is /13 instead /14... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
notsch
|
posted: 2012-06-11 18:01:14 (ID: 44280) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Yes, because there are 14 positions OL QB WR TE RB FB DL LB CB SF K P G KR If there is no G as example, it is /13 instead /14...  
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Bug reporting / Strange (wrong?) overall rating? | |
