no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Tackling Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
detroit
|
posted: 2012-07-15 17:59:35 (ID: 47816) Report Abuse |
|
Ok, in the Hall of Fame tab, one pull down is tackling. More tackles, higher on the list.
It's really seems by looking at the results, the results are in reverse order. Meaning, the better teams have FEWER tackles than the bad teams. So, really, the team with the FEWEST tackles should be on the top of the list. Just saying...    |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-07-15 18:02:24 (ID: 47817) Report Abuse |
|
The team with the fewest tackles is also not the best team.
The best stat would be the good tackles/missed tackles-ratio. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-07-15 18:06:52 (ID: 47820) Report Abuse | |
|
It is HoF...so it is not about best or worse or whatever...the most tackles make it. As clear as Klosbrühe...to me at least
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-07-15 18:08:18 (ID: 47821) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
As clear as Klosbrühe  Your opinion is absolutly clear  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-07-15 21:44:27 (ID: 47843) Report Abuse |
|
Right now more tackles usually indicates a worse team only because the better team has offense on the field longer. Those tackle number mean more when teams are fairly even.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
detroit
|
posted: 2012-07-15 22:05:57 (ID: 47846) Report Abuse |
|
Tackling is an absolute statistical number, agreed
If tackling is supposed to represent anything relevant, like a teams defense ability, then I would say it is not very relevant 
Not to quarrel here, but those of us who are into defensive systems would really like a "better" statistic than tackles. As just noted above by another poster (that 49er, I reckon) may tackles/missed tackles percentage, or fewest points scored against might be a better measure. I'm not sure Tackles by itself is a relevant number. imho   : |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-07-16 11:12:57 (ID: 47892) Report Abuse |
|
I think "tackles" are usually represented among common statistics, whatever their value may be.
However, I agree with you there are better stats to rank effective defenders, such as "fumbles forced" and "fumbles recovered". I've argued before they should be included in the stats section imo. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Tackling | |
