no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Why we don't need a hard salary cap, why it will be difficult to stay on top.. Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-08-05 20:43:32 (ID: 50362) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
pete wrote:
Finally: we promised you would get a chance to test and learn the new engine before it goes "hot" for league and cup games...and we usually keep our promises... Do we get fancy job titles? and paid in credits?  Something like "Junior testing engineer, RZA simulation department EMEA"? I'm not here to get you coffee all day long as I can't stand the smell of it. Tea ill gladly get |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-08-07 14:48:00 (ID: 50698) Report Abuse |
|
Here my opinion to the original topic. I belive a hard salary cap will be harder to manager and many teams will loose good players, because they hit the cap. The "soft" cap (limited by the income) allow you to be one or two seasons above your income, but you will reach the point were you have to manage the salaries.
The other point in this thread was the roster limit. I don't know, were the 45 players comes from. The roster limit in the regular season is 53 players in the NFL. Additional every team can have up to 8 players on the practice squad. Pete was so gracious to allow 55 players on gameday and additional 15 players for you "practice squad". |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-08-07 14:55:45 (ID: 50704) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
The other point in this thread was the roster limit. I don't know, were the 45 players comes from. I think 45 maybe comes from the previous NFL limit of 45 active players on gameday (45 plus an 'emergency' QB) .... although I think this rule has recently been changed to 46 by dropping the 'emergency QB' rule). |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Grzymisław
|
posted: 2012-08-07 16:56:14 (ID: 50734) Report Abuse |
|
What do you think is maximum possible rating for the team. Best teams already achieved 54(maybe some can set 55, maybe 56 by removing weaker reservers?). What do you think is level which would be hard to pass? Is it 75, 80? Would like to know your opinions. I suppose it's possible to build a team above 90, but I wrote before about the one we can survive financially with(having solid coaching staff, facilities, maxed youth academy, scout etc.).
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-08-07 17:04:32 (ID: 50736) Report Abuse |
|
Grzymisław wrote:
What do you think is maximum possible rating for the team. Best teams already achieved 54(maybe some can set 55, maybe 56 by removing weaker reservers?). What do you think is level which would be hard to pass? Is it 75, 80? Would like to know your opinions. I suppose it's possible to build a team above 90, but I wrote before about the one we can survive financially with(having solid coaching staff, facilities, maxed youth academy, scout etc.). I think 70 will be outstanding. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-08-07 17:10:04 (ID: 50740) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Grzymisław wrote:
What do you think is maximum possible rating for the team. Best teams already achieved 54(maybe some can set 55, maybe 56 by removing weaker reservers?). What do you think is level which would be hard to pass? Is it 75, 80? Would like to know your opinions. I suppose it's possible to build a team above 90, but I wrote before about the one we can survive financially with(having solid coaching staff, facilities, maxed youth academy, scout etc.). I think 70 will be outstanding. At the moment 70 is fine but as teams get better and more developed you will find the number of players teams have will drop substantially. Probably to around the 50-60 region. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Grzymisław
|
posted: 2012-08-07 17:59:41 (ID: 50751) Report Abuse |
|
bwadders76 wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
Grzymisław wrote:
What do you think is maximum possible rating for the team. Best teams already achieved 54(maybe some can set 55, maybe 56 by removing weaker reservers?). What do you think is level which would be hard to pass? Is it 75, 80? Would like to know your opinions. I suppose it's possible to build a team above 90, but I wrote before about the one we can survive financially with(having solid coaching staff, facilities, maxed youth academy, scout etc.). I think 70 will be outstanding. At the moment 70 is fine but as teams get better and more developed you will find the number of players teams have will drop substantially. Probably to around the 50-60 region. Well, for now 50 is fine. Never seen anyone at 55(54,8 was highest I've seen, I confess I don't look at other leagues so often last weeks). Thanks for your opinions. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-08-07 18:16:35 (ID: 50755) Report Abuse |
|
Grzymisław wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
Grzymisław wrote:
What do you think is maximum possible rating for the team. Best teams already achieved 54(maybe some can set 55, maybe 56 by removing weaker reservers?). What do you think is level which would be hard to pass? Is it 75, 80? Would like to know your opinions. I suppose it's possible to build a team above 90, but I wrote before about the one we can survive financially with(having solid coaching staff, facilities, maxed youth academy, scout etc.). I think 70 will be outstanding. At the moment 70 is fine but as teams get better and more developed you will find the number of players teams have will drop substantially. Probably to around the 50-60 region. Well, for now 50 is fine. Never seen anyone at 55(54,8 was highest I've seen, I confess I don't look at other leagues so often last weeks). Thanks for your opinions. blonde moment  youre talking ratings and I was talking numbers
sorry havent had a  since yesterday |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
mikemike778
|
posted: 2012-08-07 22:35:58 (ID: 50841) Report Abuse |
|
Even so ... can't agree with you on the players.
Think teams will always have around 70 just the bottom end of the roster will be purely development players. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Why we don't need a hard salary cap, why it will be difficult to stay on top.. | |
