Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / Match Engine Search Forum
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  4  5  6 >|  
Poster Message
spuddy1972
posted: 2012-11-18 20:55:13 (ID: 68925) Report Abuse
TombKing wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
spuddy1972 wrote:
TombKing wrote:
I can't complain. I'm quite satisfied with how things are going so far


Lets see if we can put a dent in your impressive run


Ding Ding seconds out round one


Bring it on


I have a feeling I'll be needing the magic sponge
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Swordpriest1
posted: 2012-11-18 23:45:08 (ID: 68948) Report Abuse
JonnyP wrote:
Kottan wrote:
I love changes. Then I have to respond, and the game is active and interesting. In games where absolutely nothing happens, then this games will be dull with time.

Therefore I wish and demand changes and improvements from time to time.

Thanks
Kottan


Yes yes and yes again....


The match engine is looking much better than the previous one.. in terms of big plays, all Pete needs to do now is somehow find a way of allowing the defense to make tackles 15-50 yards downfield so that every breakaway does not result in a TD.

BUT.... for 4-5 seasons, safeties and corners, and to a slightly lesser extent linebackers, have been neglected positions in RZA. How many of us prioritised DL to try to stuff the previously dominant running game? How many teams put their best allround defensive players at MLB/OLB/DE instead of SS?

I've been playing teams who are trying to field a dime all day against 4WR but who only have 3-4 CBs on their roster, equally how do you expect a defense to play 30-40 snaps in 3-3-5 when you only have a couple of capable safeties?

I have a receiver for example with 48+ speed/41+ strength/30+ agility/ 30+catching/ 30+ positioning/20+ carrying? How many teams have a CB capable of single coverage on a guy like that? He would need to be double teamed.

So what options are there?

Missed tackles delay the receiver more? Maybe the tackle is only partially 'missed', the CB has hold of the wideout, but struggles to bring him down, then a FS comes steaming in? Maybe intelligent DBs team tackle a receiver - one stands him up, the other takes his legs? Or maybe they start to knock the receiver out of bounds rather than actually bring him down?

Then of course there are the much needed adjustments to blitzing.

These are all options.


His TW is 80 or else that man is 45 years old.... because there are no PEDs in this game.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
bwadders76
posted: 2012-11-19 00:44:19 (ID: 68950) Report Abuse
spuddy1972 wrote:
TombKing wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
spuddy1972 wrote:
TombKing wrote:
I can't complain. I'm quite satisfied with how things are going so far


Lets see if we can put a dent in your impressive run


Ding Ding seconds out round one


Bring it on


I have a feeling I'll be needing the magic sponge


I remember the magic sponge
Quote   Reply   Edit  
DrBurrs
posted: 2012-11-19 21:17:07 (ID: 69040) Report Abuse
I know it's against a bot, but how are these teams so good at passing? supercup game
Quote   Reply   Edit  
bwadders76
posted: 2012-11-20 00:08:18 (ID: 69055) Report Abuse
DrBurrs wrote:
I know it's against a bot, but how are these teams so good at passing? supercup game


The 4-3-4 defence isnt that good against the pass.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
DrBurrs
posted: 2012-11-20 03:14:05 (ID: 69064) Report Abuse
bwadders76 wrote:
DrBurrs wrote:
I know it's against a bot, but how are these teams so good at passing? supercup game


The 4-3-4 defence isnt that good against the pass.


Could it also be that they pass medium or long often? I haven't tested that.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
oddball
posted: 2012-11-20 09:45:56 (ID: 69072) Report Abuse
med/long high risk low completion also high risk of interceptions.
if u look at most div 1 teams playing sc bots it will be similar results.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  4  5  6 >|  
Main / Discussions / Match Engine