no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Super Cup - Playoffs are here! Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 12 13 14 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-03-25 13:06:49 (ID: 88073) Report Abuse |
|
Super proud of my Convicts today - a good mongrel of an effort! They played so well that the head convict actually thought they might steal a win at one point.
Key plays - 2 INTs, a sack on 2nd and 3 at the 7 and a lousy 1yd completion on 4th and 3! 
We played some great goal line D though! Chuffed!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2013-03-25 13:10:39 (ID: 88074) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Super proud of my Convicts today - a good mongrel of an effort! They played so well that the head convict actually thought they might steal a win at one point. Key plays - 2 INTs, a sack on 2nd and 3 at the 7 and a lousy 1yd completion on 4th and 3!
We played some great goal line D though! Chuffed! "Proud of a convict" only something an Australian or a mother could say
Seriously though unlucky today |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2013-03-25 15:03:04 (ID: 88083) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Super proud of my Convicts today - a good mongrel of an effort! They played so well that the head convict actually thought they might steal a win at one point. Key plays - 2 INTs, a sack on 2nd and 3 at the 7 and a lousy 1yd completion on 4th and 3!
We played some great goal line D though! Chuffed! Yea, i got some luck in having that win against you. You did good. Haven checked the game yet exept the final result. Seems you did some good stops at 3&goal, making me just having 4x3 points FG instead of 4x7 points TD  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2013-03-25 18:33:51 (ID: 88102) Report Abuse |
|
ASU Bears @ Eagles .... 0-0 after 30+ minutes ...... rarely ever seen a deadlock like that after 30 minutes
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lamumia
|
posted: 2013-03-25 19:00:18 (ID: 88105) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:
ASU Bears @ Eagles .... 0-0 after 30+ minutes ...... rarely ever seen a deadlock like that after 30 minutes Wow, going into overtime, and still no score  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-03-25 19:16:44 (ID: 88108) Report Abuse |
|
lol, ASU I-form vs. 5-3-3: 24 / 69 / 2.9 on passing plays.
And we have to keep this insane 3.0 engine for another long, long season...  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-03-25 19:56:32 (ID: 88122) Report Abuse | |
|
insane...lol
ymmd  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-03-25 21:09:09 (ID: 88160) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
insane...lol ymmd I'm happy for your lolling, a little bit less for your sarcasm in the other thread. If last year's engine was unbalanced with the mess of long TDs, this one is more than balanced. It's...flat. Flaws? Only some: - too low percentage of complete passes for good air attacks (vs. poor defenses too) - too low numbers of sacks - no signs of blitz management - no fumbles for QBs and WRs - too low difference between defenses vs. different attack formations and plays - no possibility to s e l e c t percentages of play and position for a single player - no possibility to set the depht of the defense To these we can add the flying DEs, the flying CBs defending TWO WRs at one time... I think all these issues have already been discussed during this season. Maybe less than other problems in the past, but I remember more than one post in this direction. The problem is not: "another year with this engine", the problem is: "the master of the steam seems to have no intention to call into question this engine". More clear now?  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-03-25 21:11:49 (ID: 88162) Report Abuse | |
|
panoramix wrote:
pete wrote:
insane...lol ymmd I'm happy for your lolling, a little bit less for your sarcasm in the other thread. If last year's engine was unbalanced with the mess of long TDs, this one is more than balanced. It's...flat. Flaws? Only some: - too low percentage of complete passes for good air attacks (vs. poor defenses too) - too low numbers of sacks - no signs of blitz management - no fumbles for QBs and WRs - too low difference between defenses vs. different attack formations and plays - no possibility to s e l e c t percentages of play and position for a single player - no possibility to set the depht of the defense To these we can add the flying DEs, the flying CBs defending TWO WRs at one time... I think all these issues have already been discussed during this season. Maybe less than other problems in the past, but I remember more than one post in this direction. The problem is not: "another year with this engine", the problem is: "the master of the steam seems to have no intention to call into question this engine". More clear now? If this would hav been the first post, I wouldnt have posted this sarcastic thing, promised. Thank you for telling details of your thinking
Now there is one issue...some think, it is imbalanced, others like you think it is too flat....others told "too much randomness"... It will be a tough job to satisfy all of you  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-03-25 21:13:36 (ID: 88163) Report Abuse | |
|
panoramix wrote:
"the master of the steam seems to have no intention to call into question this engine". You knew while typing this that this is complete "bullshit", didn't you?
If this was a serious statement, it would show that you don't know me a little bit |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 12 13 14 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Super Cup - Playoffs are here! | |
