Error Icon
Check how to improve security while using RedZoneAction.org
Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Suggestions / How about when Fans dislike seeing a team full of DLs... Search Forum
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  4 5  6  7  >   >|  
Rating:
Rating
  Poll: Cause penalty in ticket income for managers abusing their ACs by setting all players to the same position?, Poll closed, votes: 231
141
Yes, please!
48
No, please!
42
Your turn, Master Yoda!
Poster Message
Brewnoe
posted: 2015-05-17 03:21:29 (ID: 100054464) Report Abuse
DonWilliam wrote:
JonnyP wrote:
Maybe have experience in some way linked to positions played?


Believe it or not, but that was the original thought behind the idea i posted above.

I just thought it would be more simple for Pete to just add an experience penalty to the already existing hit on morale and TC.


I very valid thought, but there should really be a lot of discussion before it's being voted on.

Using Johnny P's example and expanding it a bit:
(For example, my current QB was drafted as a QB, spent several seasons as backup QB, before I switched him to CB to fill a hole. )

Should a player lose 3/4s of their experience because they moved to a different position for a few games? Sounds like Special Trait: Amnesia


Would it be more reasonable if exp was split in half?
Up to 2.5 stars of "base exp" - showing up for practice, watching film, etc. - gained every training update
Up to 2.5 stars of "positional exp" - training at position X - gained based on a combination of training updates at that position (for the YA) and/or snaps at that position (for the senior team)


Lee1950 wrote: I agaree with earlier posts that it seems okay to do this in the Yoth Academy.
I'd be perfectly happy if teams could not play any players out of position at all.


That's just ... ( I have nothing nice to say )
DEs can't play OLB, RBs can't play FB, CBs can't play SF ...
Quote   Reply   Edit  
andrew2scott2
posted: 2015-05-17 04:22:14 (ID: 100054470) Report Abuse
I'll say it again. disagree with this. If a team is penalize For players not on the depth chart
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Brewnoe
posted: 2015-05-17 04:41:30 (ID: 100054471) Report Abuse
Llana wrote:
this vote is way too early.


Unless Pete just wants to put it to bed and say good night, good bye and thanks for the all the fish

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Buddy Ryan
posted: 2015-05-17 07:21:22 (ID: 100054478) Report Abuse
McKay93 wrote:
Since this came out of an YA discussion, what is your plan exactly?
If more then 50% of YA-Players have the same position, reduce Ticket income by 30%?


if this penalty gets triggered by the YA too, than I'm totally against it. i also dont get the idea if it was only concerning the actual depth chart - we not just increase OOP?

Last edited on 2015-05-17 07:25:12 by Buddy Ryan
Quote   Reply   Edit  
pete
H2TAGIT4Q

Europe   pete owns a supporter account   pete is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-01/S00
Posts: 20517
Top Manager



 
 posted: 2015-05-17 22:25:24 (ID: 100054567) Report Abuse
Buddy Ryan wrote:
McKay93 wrote:
Since this came out of an YA discussion, what is your plan exactly?
If more then 50% of YA-Players have the same position, reduce Ticket income by 30%?


if this penalty gets triggered by the YA too, than I'm totally against it. i also dont get the idea if it was only concerning the actual depth chart - we not just increase OOP?


not the YA, and these managers dont care about losing a game
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Gambler75
posted: 2015-05-17 22:33:40 (ID: 100054573) Report Abuse
I could see a portion of non-YA causing a penalty. That said, where I know my team won't be competitive, I'd likely just move enough players to be EXACTLY at that %.

I actually like the suggestion about doing some sort of overhaul to coaching setup better - than penalizing people who were simply trying to maximize the current one.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Drac32Drac
posted: 2015-05-17 22:37:04 (ID: 100054574) Report Abuse
Gambler75 wrote:
I could see a portion of non-YA causing a penalty. That said, where I know my team won't be competitive, I'd likely just move enough players to be EXACTLY at that %.

I actually like the suggestion about doing some sort of overhaul to coaching setup better - than penalizing people who were simply trying to maximize the current one.


I wholeheartedly agree on this point.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Meitheisman
posted: 2015-05-17 23:01:10 (ID: 100054578) Report Abuse
Drac32Drac wrote:
Gambler75 wrote:
I could see a portion of non-YA causing a penalty. That said, where I know my team won't be competitive, I'd likely just move enough players to be EXACTLY at that %.

I actually like the suggestion about doing some sort of overhaul to coaching setup better - than penalizing people who were simply trying to maximize the current one.


I wholeheartedly agree on this point.


Me too.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
athos
posted: 2015-05-19 09:25:15 (ID: 100054660) Report Abuse
Gambler75 wrote:
I actually like the suggestion about doing some sort of overhaul to coaching setup better - than penalizing people who were simply trying to maximize the current one.


To those who have done this at some point in their history (I am a prime and very recent example) - then my very humble and respectful opinion is that the sporting and gentlemanly vote should be a 'No' or 'leave it to Pete'
Quote   Reply   Edit  
McKay93
posted: 2015-06-19 14:53:05 (ID: 100056281) Report Abuse
ToDoList wrote:cause a penalty if managers utilize rosters full of one position, just to support the Out of Position penalty, cause less spectators on games...


So how exactly is this going to be implimented? It kind of read like: As soon there is a player OOP on the roster, there will be less spectators.

If it is really implimeted like that without a threshold, it would go way out of line. Like for example, a few weeks ago, I had two injured OL, so I put a FB at OL on the Depth Chart, what would result in less income only because RNG hated me?
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  4 5  6  7  >   >|  
Main / Suggestions / How about when Fans dislike seeing a team full of DLs...
© 2009 - 2024 by Pete     Visit our sister game RedZoneClash.org           IPv6 disabled! Booo, you are using old style IPv4...