no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / Financial warning process reconsideration Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 7 8 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
posted: 2017-01-02 10:36:33 (ID: 100094847) Report Abuse | |
In all seriousness why limit peoples bank?
Why attack or should I say limit how people manage their team? A fat bank doesn't score touch downs.. If someone wants to accumulate $$ it should be fine and allowed. Not limited. If you want to reasonably reduce accounts restructure player pay using experience as a factor. It makes little sense that a 1 star 40 skilled rookie is paid the same as a 40 skill 5 exp veteran. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-02 10:46:56 (ID: 100094854) Report Abuse | |
There is no limit on the table, and never was!
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2017-01-02 14:47:40 (ID: 100094886) Report Abuse |
punch drunk wrote:
It makes little sense that a 1 star 40 skilled rookie is paid the same as a 40 skill 5 exp veteran. they do not get get paid the same.But it a very small difference. This is why i have suggest in the past the wages be base on there skill after the xp is factor in. Which XP makes a hug difference in game. Why not in salary. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
copperviking
|
posted: 2017-01-02 21:00:15 (ID: 100094924) Report Abuse |
I'm not sure if this is right thread or even if this idea is possible or has been brought up before but after watching the final weekend of the NFL, all the sports talking heads were talking about was the players that needed yards, catches, sacks, etc to increase their salary through performance incentives written into their contracts. Since I have read in more than one forum that Pete would like to get some money out of the game, I thought this may be an effective way to do this. The performance bonus could be the same across the board, so all players are affected equally.
eg. if a player gets 10 sacks player earns bonus $1m 15 sacks bonus $2m etc. This could be done of every major stat, TDs, Interceptions, Catches, Carries. To be honest, I have no idea what the correct numbers should be and how much the bonus should be but it was just a thought i had and I am throwing it out there for discussion. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-02 21:05:28 (ID: 100094925) Report Abuse | |
This is quite an interesting idea, IMO. And I can smell the "no, you can't do that because of..."
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-02 21:09:36 (ID: 100094927) Report Abuse | |
pete wrote:
This is quite an interesting idea, IMO. And I can smell the "no, you can't do that because of..." Well. A performance driven wage is normally a smallish salary with the big performance bonuses. I can see teams not playing players in order to avoid this system. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-02 21:11:32 (ID: 100094928) Report Abuse | |
punch drunk wrote:
pete wrote:
This is quite an interesting idea, IMO. And I can smell the "no, you can't do that because of..." Well. A performance driven wage is normally a smallish salary with the big performance bonuses. I can see teams not playing players in order to avoid this system. Wouldnt this be kind of management as well? |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-02 21:13:55 (ID: 100094929) Report Abuse | |
pete wrote:
punch drunk wrote:
pete wrote:
This is quite an interesting idea, IMO. And I can smell the "no, you can't do that because of..." Well. A performance driven wage is normally a smallish salary with the big performance bonuses. I can see teams not playing players in order to avoid this system. Wouldnt this be kind of management as well? Yes. Just like it's a kind of management to build your bank. How about player wage that is strongly influenced by experience level.. Like it is in the real world. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Tarjan
|
posted: 2017-01-02 21:18:28 (ID: 100094932) Report Abuse |
I don´t get it realy, how could a discussion over financial warnings drift away to another tax discussion?
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-01-02 21:20:01 (ID: 100094934) Report Abuse | |
That is how this forum works
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 7 8 > >| | |
Main / Discussions / Financial warning process reconsideration |