no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / New attempt to create a tax based on income Search Forum | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 12 13 14 > >| | |||||||
| Rating: | |||||||
Poll: Create a tax for seasonal gains of a manager depending on his status and bankroll?,
Poll closed,
votes: 216
|
|||||||
| Poster | Message | ||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 14:55:44 (ID: 100094536) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
It is not about destrying the teams finances, even some manager are behaving like we are going to kill them...
I guess I should change the proposal... each manager has to pay 10% in his seasonal gains, without any exception. We put this into a bug pot, divide it by the number of human managers, and payback each share to them... |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2016-12-29 14:59:58 (ID: 100094537) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Templer wrote:
pete wrote:
The idea is to stop teams from creating huge bankrolls, without investing from this money... Good thinking. 
Can someone please explain to me why this should be changed? I don't know who the team with $2.2B in the bank is but it makes no difference to the way I play and enjoy RZA so I would like to understand why people sitting on large sums of RZA money is seen as a problem? How is it affecting other teams? Regarding seasonal profits. If team X makes $500M in one season because it sells a bunch of players and then breaks even for 9 seasons, why should it be taxed more than team Y who saved $50M a year for 10 seasons? I see both strategies as equally valid so I don't see why one should be taxed and not the other. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-29 15:01:18 (ID: 100094538) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
pete wrote:
It is not about destrying the teams finances, even some manager are behaving like we are going to kill them... I guess I should change the proposal... each manager has to pay 10% in his seasonal gains, without any exception. We put this into a bug pot, divide it by the number of human managers, and payback each share to them... Pete do as you like. I just don't like bank roll be apart of the requirements |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 15:04:05 (ID: 100094539) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
Meitheisman: OK, without numbers, your post translates to
One guy is becoming rich in year 1, while 10 others have to work 10 years for that same ammount. Why should this single guy pay taxes... Just consider the ammount of X to be the money you need to run your team healthy . aka the minimum budget you need as a person for surviving... |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 15:04:51 (ID: 100094540) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
Pete do as you like. I just don't like bank roll be apart of the requirements If I skip that, managers building up their team right now would have to pay tax as well...don't you get the idea behind? |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-29 15:10:43 (ID: 100094542) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
I get the idea. But I prefer the idea ever one tax equally once the hit x
To be honest I would go with slider in or tax brackets. So x profit = no tax X profit =5% Xprofit=10% Xprofit =20% And so on. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2016-12-29 15:11:43 (ID: 100094544) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
pete wrote:
Meitheisman: OK, without numbers, your post translates to One guy is becoming rich in year 1, while 10 others have to work 10 years for that same ammount. Why should this single guy pay taxes... Just consider the ammount of X to be the money you need to run your team healthy . aka the minimum budget you need as a person for surviving... The guy who chose to become rich fast already suffered consequences, he had to sell his best players to do that in one year while the other team could put these players on the field and win more games (and money!) for 10 seasons. Honestly I would never go through a fire sale myself because I would not want to spend the time and effort needed for a complete rebuild. If a manager is willing to do that though it is not affecting me in any way so I don't see why this strategy should be taxed more than my slow build strategy. Am I making sense? |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2016-12-29 15:12:54 (ID: 100094546) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
It something that may make me leave. But I would need to see how the numbers work first.be for I would make that decision
|
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| posted: 2016-12-29 15:22:43 (ID: 100094550) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
It something that may make me leave. But I would need to see how the numbers work first.be for I would make that decision Based on your last seasons numbers you wouldn't be affected at all... |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
|
McKay93
|
posted: 2016-12-29 15:35:52 (ID: 100094554) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
Meitheisman wrote:
Can someone please explain to me why this should be changed? I don't know who the team with $2.2B in the bank is but it makes no difference to the way I play and enjoy RZA so I would like to understand why people sitting on large sums of RZA money is seen as a problem? How is it affecting other teams? THIS I think this needs to be answered by pete before we can go forward on this. Who do you want to target with this tax exactly? WHY? Just a plain tax on all teams for season profit would be fairer, though i still wouldnt support that idea. |
|||||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
| reply Mark this thread unread | |||||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 12 13 14 > >| | |||||||
| Main / Suggestions / New attempt to create a tax based on income | |||||||
