no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Limiting the financial power of rich teams Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 13 14 15 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2017-01-07 10:42:28 (ID: 100095317) Report Abuse |
|
mikemike778 wrote:
Apply inflation. Increase all revenue and costs by between 1 and 3 pc a season. Would devalue savings. Combine this with a sensible salary cap and add more ways to spend money. I would honestly ditch the coach max points. Yay   |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-01-07 11:57:29 (ID: 100095319) Report Abuse | |
|
mikemike778 wrote:
Apply inflation. Increase all revenue and costs by between 1 and 3 pc a season. This is not possible without much workload |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-01-07 17:27:50 (ID: 100095329) Report Abuse | |
|
I'm okay with a transfer tax, but how does this level the playing field for smaller, newer clubs?
I see it more likely that teams will use the Transfer Market less and ergo tend to train and over train their own players more. Doesn't that sort of benefit the fat wallets? Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-01-07 17:35:45 (ID: 100095333) Report Abuse | |
|
It is not my goal to hit "rich veterans clubs" with this. It is more an attempt to level out imbalances from now on. #ICannotFixThePast
We have managers who made several billions on the market. We find it just fair if such traders pay a higher share on taxes...at least, of they attempt to "day-trade"... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2017-01-07 17:38:10 (ID: 100095334) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse |
|
It to mim the effect of day traders. My question what happens to player you had on your 2 or 3 season training.
But they never played a game. So you sell how would he be taxed. I though this tax would target day trader. Not force players into the line up. That simple did not pan out/ Or where replaced by better player. There should be also days on the roster exemption as well like 156day or more only pay 25 or 15 Last edited on 2017-01-07 17:44:08 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-01-07 17:43:53 (ID: 100095336) Report Abuse | |
|
Read the announcement...it should clarify all you need to know...
In your special example: if you BOUGHT him, but NEVER PLAYED him, he is handled like it would be DAY-TRADING...50% tax |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-01-07 17:44:50 (ID: 100095337) Report Abuse | |
|
Oh, and nobody forces you to let players play...nobody! It is your own decision, and therefore you can only blame yourself if you get hit by the maximum tax...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2017-01-07 17:45:58 (ID: 100095338) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
thanks why i do approve of the tax it self.
I do think there should be also days on the roster exemption as well like 156day or 234 only pay 25 or 15 Last edited on 2017-01-07 17:47:18 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-01-07 17:54:30 (ID: 100095341) Report Abuse | |
|
No, because managers could than keep the players for this period...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2017-01-07 17:56:21 (ID: 100095343) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
|
well 15 games is not long as long st snaps count. 2 games a week /16 so 8 weeks 56 days. I'll keep that in mind
Last edited on 2017-01-07 17:57:35 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 13 14 15 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Limiting the financial power of rich teams | |
