no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Thunder / Thunder 1.1 Season 25 Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 21 22 23 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
jggreen
|
posted: 2017-03-21 15:36:29 (ID: 100100996) Report Abuse |
Bovakian wrote:
Well done jg. Nothing against the way you play I just wish Pete would reduce the advantage SG formations have as I am sure that teams playing them too much would see D's pick them up and cause more fumbles by the FB's and takeaways from the WR's. I saw it a lot in the Elite League and it doesn't appear to make much difference what defense you put up the yards keep being gained. I have not always used it. But realized the team's winning run it. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2017-03-21 16:15:38 (ID: 100101000) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
Bovakian wrote:
I just wish Pete would reduce the advantage SG formations have as I am sure that teams playing them too much would see D's pick them up and cause more fumbles by the FB's and takeaways from the WR's. I saw it a lot in the Elite League and it doesn't appear to make much difference what defense you put up the yards keep being gained. Looking at the box stats and I can totally see why Bovakian makes that comment. The idea was / is that karma / lopsided penalty would deal with this? EDIT: also not blaming jggreen for using this tactic, it's just good research / scouting on his behalf Last edited on 2017-03-21 16:25:11 by Cheesehead |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
krugodam
|
posted: 2017-03-21 22:29:17 (ID: 100101029) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse |
Cheesehead wrote:
Bovakian wrote:
I just wish Pete would reduce the advantage SG formations have as I am sure that teams playing them too much would see D's pick them up and cause more fumbles by the FB's and takeaways from the WR's. I saw it a lot in the Elite League and it doesn't appear to make much difference what defense you put up the yards keep being gained. Looking at the box stats and I can totally see why Bovakian makes that comment. The idea was / is that karma / lopsided penalty would deal with this? EDIT: also not blaming jggreen for using this tactic, it's just good research / scouting on his behalf My opponent threw out of SG4 71 times (for 436 yards) and ran out of wishbone 8 times...and nothing else. I did have three interceptions in the second half but to me the lopsided penalty doesn't seem to have a huge impact. The stats per quarter (yards per catch) were pretty similar through the game. (small sample size I know ) Unless you have 7 Richard Sherman clones playing for your team it's hard to defend! EDIT to add: This is what the manual says "Having a playbook, showing strong signs for lopsided tactics: the defense gets a small advantage." Last edited on 2017-03-21 22:39:21 by krugodam |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
jggreen
|
posted: 2017-03-23 15:49:13 (ID: 100101151) Report Abuse |
jggreen wrote:
Bovakian wrote:
Well done jg. Nothing against the way you play I just wish Pete would reduce the advantage SG formations have as I am sure that teams playing them too much would see D's pick them up and cause more fumbles by the FB's and takeaways from the WR's. I saw it a lot in the Elite League and it doesn't appear to make much difference what defense you put up the yards keep being gained. In fairness you only scored 10 points and my offense has nothing or little to do with defense. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Bovakian
|
posted: 2017-03-25 10:40:59 (ID: 100101199) Report Abuse |
Bova's Week 3 Predictions Alligators over Llamas Apes over Sultans DV over Jac Fliger over Swifts Narann over Patriots Nightcrew over Stompers Plumbers over Falcons Gaming over Steel Cardinals over PGI Machine over Engineers Wolves over SQUALES twh over Miners Divers over UNTOUCHABLES Thangs over Pirates Wolflings over Rebels Xu Da over Bolts As Beckos appears to be broken I will no longer be keeping a running score this season. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
JonatanRiver
|
posted: 2017-03-25 14:21:16 (ID: 100101203) Report Abuse |
That was close...
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-03-25 14:22:43 (ID: 100101204) Report Abuse |
JonatanRiver wrote:
That was close... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
passionatelad
|
posted: 2017-03-25 14:44:05 (ID: 100101205) Report Abuse |
Nearly caused a shock myself
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2017-03-25 16:58:30 (ID: 100101218) Report Abuse |
Wolflings loss is unexpected. Some close games that were close to an upset perhaps. The new teams are really pulling their weight...nice to see!
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
passionatelad
|
posted: 2017-03-25 17:37:18 (ID: 100101223) Report Abuse |
Using my starting DC as of next game now so should strengthen things up for me hopefully
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 21 22 23 > >| | |
Main / Thunder / Thunder 1.1 Season 25 |