no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / rule clarification Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 8 9 10 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
posted: 2017-05-08 16:00:43 (ID: 100103573) Report Abuse | |
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-05-08 16:14:38 (ID: 100103574) Edits found: 2 Report Abuse |
gabriel06 wrote:
He wouldn't have had anything like the success he has had if he was playing Admirals football....hell Rock, even you would be pretty dominant in Thunder 1.1! Feels like Dejavu all over again. Perhaps you should also include the statement that teams can't compete without good interior OLs and that I should talk after I beat someone. Ah, the nostalgia. I bet even my bigger critics are enjoying the irony. Come Cap and Johnny it's okay to crack a smile on this one. Even Buddy. I hope anytime a Thunder Team beats your ass they add the game to this thread. The strategy of insulting a whole league and putting a target on yourself that surely is a great strategy for success. Last edited on 2017-05-08 16:15:52 by thomastem |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
gabriel06
|
posted: 2017-05-08 16:55:19 (ID: 100103579) Report Abuse |
thomastem wrote:
gabriel06 wrote:
He wouldn't have had anything like the success he has had if he was playing Admirals football....hell Rock, even you would be pretty dominant in Thunder 1.1! Feels like Dejavu all over again. Perhaps you should also include the statement that teams can't compete without good interior OLs and that I should talk after I beat someone. Ah, the nostalgia. I bet even my bigger critics are enjoying the irony. Come Cap and Johnny it's okay to crack a smile on this one. Even Buddy. I hope anytime a Thunder Team beats your ass they add the game to this thread. The strategy of insulting a whole league and putting a target on yourself that surely is a great strategy for success. quite the martyr aren't we....? facts are that the Thunder league is ranked as the lowest of all RZA leagues, and well over 100 points lower than the Admirals league. This based on stats, not general assumption or opinion. Something that is true isn't an insult - it is what it is. Does that mean any Admirals team would beat any Thunder team? No. Does that mean the overall league standard is higher in the Admirals league, with wins harder to come by, and therefore any record claimed in Thunder would not be as 'easily' achieved in Admirals? Absolutely. Stands to reason and is perfectly logical. Everything is relative. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-05-08 17:10:37 (ID: 100103582) Report Abuse |
Too easy.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
copperviking
|
posted: 2017-05-08 17:34:35 (ID: 100103586) Report Abuse |
Thank you. I had forgotten all about that Jerry Burns rant. Made my day seeing it.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Bovakian
|
posted: 2017-05-08 17:35:25 (ID: 100103587) Report Abuse |
gabriel06 wrote:
thomastem wrote:
gabriel06 wrote:
He wouldn't have had anything like the success he has had if he was playing Admirals football....hell Rock, even you would be pretty dominant in Thunder 1.1! Feels like Dejavu all over again. Perhaps you should also include the statement that teams can't compete without good interior OLs and that I should talk after I beat someone. Ah, the nostalgia. I bet even my bigger critics are enjoying the irony. Come Cap and Johnny it's okay to crack a smile on this one. Even Buddy. I hope anytime a Thunder Team beats your ass they add the game to this thread. The strategy of insulting a whole league and putting a target on yourself that surely is a great strategy for success. quite the martyr aren't we....? facts are that the Thunder league is ranked as the lowest of all RZA leagues, and well over 100 points lower than the Admirals league. This based on stats, not general assumption or opinion. Something that is true isn't an insult - it is what it is. Does that mean any Admirals team would beat any Thunder team? No. Does that mean the overall league standard is higher in the Admirals league, with wins harder to come by, and therefore any record claimed in Thunder would not be as 'easily' achieved in Admirals? Absolutely. Stands to reason and is perfectly logical. Everything is relative. Stands to reason where your kick off time has been once of the most sort after, hence the turn around of managers has not been so great and the reason why Admirals is considered a tough league to play in, however don't forget that Thunder along with Admirals have the best SC and CoC records in the game. We may not have the depth in strength as Admirals, but we fight our diminished corner quite well in all competitions. You know this gabe from being in the game so long with both your teams. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-05-08 18:05:24 (ID: 100103589) Report Abuse | |
One day we must have a RZA convention, it would be so much fun!
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-05-08 18:30:16 (ID: 100103591) Report Abuse |
Jonny Utah wrote:
One day we must have a RZA convention, it would be so much fun! Open Bar. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
bobcor
|
posted: 2017-05-08 18:33:06 (ID: 100103592) Report Abuse |
Jonny Utah wrote:
One day we must have a RZA convention, it would be so much fun! I suggest we all meet in Dresden, in Pete's backyard. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-05-08 18:41:42 (ID: 100103593) Report Abuse |
bobcor wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
One day we must have a RZA convention, it would be so much fun! I suggest we all meet in Dresden, in Pete's backyard. Pete's would work. He already has the valet staff and butlers on staff to handle the needs of the RZA community. I second the motion! |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 8 9 10 > >| | |
Main / Discussions / rule clarification |