Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / American Football in real life / Green Bay Packers Search Forum
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  21  22  23  >   >|  
Poster Message
wiznooo
posted: 2017-09-11 20:44:27 (ID: 100114067) Report Abuse
JbHeng wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
Can't believe i'm the first to post after last night! Let's all bask in the glory of Mike Daniels


Career game from him... What an absolute wrecking ball. He made Sheldon Richardson like a kitten


Hard to say how much was Daniels' quality and how much Seahawks' lack of it. That o-line is gonna get Wilson killed yet.

Rodgers really did seem to relish having a solid tight end at last. They won't face a better defense, the Pack look like the only thing that might hold them back on offense is protection. Evans would be fine with Bulaga next to him, but Murphy there exposes him.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Mücke
posted: 2017-09-11 21:04:00 (ID: 100114070) Report Abuse
... Mike D yeap

... defense was an overall A++, Nick Perry great, DBacks great


... and guess who impressed me the most on offense ...

... Jordy with his 7 recs with 11.3yrds/rec and 1st of 14+ TD this season Nope!

... Marty with his great catches and run? Nope, haha!

... Monty, Cobby or Crosby? Richy, Devy or Li'ley? No No No No No

...

... nope, it was Murphy, jesus noooo not Mike, i mean Kyle, that 2nd yr blocker who delivered a great performance imo



Overall first half was great to watch defensively, second anyway, but hope they (the O) can shift into next gear in week 2 before rolling out a bit in week 3 and 4 before shifting up again in week 5. Week 7 i hope to see again my hero of the pre, Taysom Hill, it was just fun to see him playing, wasnt it?

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Browka
posted: 2017-09-11 21:47:10 (ID: 100114074) Report Abuse
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances.

(English is too hard for me right now. )
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Jonny Utah
Chelt Nam Bobbers

England   Jonny Utah owns a supporter account

Joined: 2015-02-18/S15
Posts: 1425
Top Manager



 
posted: 2017-09-12 10:44:28 (ID: 100114093) Report Abuse
I agree the lack of an o-line for Seattle made it look great, and Green Bay are far from a perfect team, I'm just going to enjoy the positives rather than looking at the negatives after a win against the Seahawks
Quote   Reply   Edit  
wiznooo
posted: 2017-09-13 07:23:54 (ID: 100114204) Report Abuse
Jonny Utah wrote:
I agree the lack of an o-line for Seattle made it look great, and Green Bay are far from a perfect team, I'm just going to enjoy the positives rather than looking at the negatives after a win against the Seahawks

Yeah, don't get me wrong, I loved it. Kyle Murphy did get a real baptism of fire and got better as the game went along. Hopefully, they can work Williams or one of the other rookie RBs in as they go along so Montgomery doesn't have to take too much pounding.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Jonny Utah
Chelt Nam Bobbers

England   Jonny Utah owns a supporter account

Joined: 2015-02-18/S15
Posts: 1425
Top Manager



 
posted: 2017-09-13 11:04:16 (ID: 100114231) Report Abuse
wiznoo wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
I agree the lack of an o-line for Seattle made it look great, and Green Bay are far from a perfect team, I'm just going to enjoy the positives rather than looking at the negatives after a win against the Seahawks

Yeah, don't get me wrong, I loved it. Kyle Murphy did get a real baptism of fire and got better as the game went along. Hopefully, they can work Williams or one of the other rookie RBs in as they go along so Montgomery doesn't have to take too much pounding.

That'd be good, I like the look of Williams and keeping Montgomery fresh would be nice
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Cheesehead
posted: 2017-09-14 18:20:12 (ID: 100114304) Report Abuse
Browka wrote:
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances.

(English is too hard for me right now. )


But don't the Pack just the RB to pound the D line into submission? I don't think they will ever expect him to be a DeMurray for example? RBs are there to keep defenses honest and to batter them so they can interfere less with passing plays?

I am no authority so please educate me if necessary
Quote   Reply   Edit  
gnikeoj
posted: 2017-09-14 18:48:36 (ID: 100114309) Report Abuse
Browka wrote:
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances.

(English is too hard for me right now. )


Ty Montgomery is listed at 216 lbs. That's comparable to Adrian Peterson's playing weight of 217 lbs. He's not too light by any measure.

Standing next to Mixon, Gordon, Peterson for comparison
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Browka
posted: 2017-09-15 06:43:40 (ID: 100114339) Report Abuse
gnikeoj wrote:
Browka wrote:
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances.

(English is too hard for me right now. )


Ty Montgomery is listed at 216 lbs. That's comparable to Adrian Peterson's playing weight of 217 lbs. He's not too light by any measure.

Standing next to Mixon, Gordon, Peterson for comparison


But... But... He seems so tiny !
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Cheesehead
posted: 2017-09-15 08:16:04 (ID: 100114349) Report Abuse
Browka wrote:
But... But... He seems so tiny !


My guess is that if he stands next to you he will look like a giant
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3  21  22  23  >   >|  
Main / American Football in real life / Green Bay Packers