no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / American Football in real life / Green Bay Packers Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 21 22 23 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
wiznooo
|
posted: 2017-09-11 20:44:27 (ID: 100114067) Report Abuse |
JbHeng wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
Can't believe i'm the first to post after last night! Let's all bask in the glory of Mike Daniels Career game from him... What an absolute wrecking ball. He made Sheldon Richardson like a kitten Hard to say how much was Daniels' quality and how much Seahawks' lack of it. That o-line is gonna get Wilson killed yet. Rodgers really did seem to relish having a solid tight end at last. They won't face a better defense, the Pack look like the only thing that might hold them back on offense is protection. Evans would be fine with Bulaga next to him, but Murphy there exposes him. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Mücke
|
posted: 2017-09-11 21:04:00 (ID: 100114070) Report Abuse |
... Mike D yeap
... defense was an overall A++, Nick Perry great, DBacks great ... and guess who impressed me the most on offense ... ... Jordy with his 7 recs with 11.3yrds/rec and 1st of 14+ TD this season Nope! ... Marty with his great catches and run? Nope, haha! ... Monty, Cobby or Crosby? Richy, Devy or Li'ley? No No No No No ... ... nope, it was Murphy, jesus noooo not Mike, i mean Kyle, that 2nd yr blocker who delivered a great performance imo Overall first half was great to watch defensively, second anyway, but hope they (the O) can shift into next gear in week 2 before rolling out a bit in week 3 and 4 before shifting up again in week 5. Week 7 i hope to see again my hero of the pre, Taysom Hill, it was just fun to see him playing, wasnt it? |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Browka
|
posted: 2017-09-11 21:47:10 (ID: 100114074) Report Abuse |
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances.
(English is too hard for me right now. ) |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-09-12 10:44:28 (ID: 100114093) Report Abuse | |
I agree the lack of an o-line for Seattle made it look great, and Green Bay are far from a perfect team, I'm just going to enjoy the positives rather than looking at the negatives after a win against the Seahawks
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
wiznooo
|
posted: 2017-09-13 07:23:54 (ID: 100114204) Report Abuse |
Jonny Utah wrote:
I agree the lack of an o-line for Seattle made it look great, and Green Bay are far from a perfect team, I'm just going to enjoy the positives rather than looking at the negatives after a win against the Seahawks Yeah, don't get me wrong, I loved it. Kyle Murphy did get a real baptism of fire and got better as the game went along. Hopefully, they can work Williams or one of the other rookie RBs in as they go along so Montgomery doesn't have to take too much pounding. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-09-13 11:04:16 (ID: 100114231) Report Abuse | |
wiznoo wrote:
Jonny Utah wrote:
I agree the lack of an o-line for Seattle made it look great, and Green Bay are far from a perfect team, I'm just going to enjoy the positives rather than looking at the negatives after a win against the Seahawks Yeah, don't get me wrong, I loved it. Kyle Murphy did get a real baptism of fire and got better as the game went along. Hopefully, they can work Williams or one of the other rookie RBs in as they go along so Montgomery doesn't have to take too much pounding. That'd be good, I like the look of Williams and keeping Montgomery fresh would be nice |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2017-09-14 18:20:12 (ID: 100114304) Report Abuse |
Browka wrote:
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances. (English is too hard for me right now. ) But don't the Pack just the RB to pound the D line into submission? I don't think they will ever expect him to be a DeMurray for example? RBs are there to keep defenses honest and to batter them so they can interfere less with passing plays? I am no authority so please educate me if necessary |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
gnikeoj
|
posted: 2017-09-14 18:48:36 (ID: 100114309) Report Abuse |
Browka wrote:
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances. (English is too hard for me right now. ) Ty Montgomery is listed at 216 lbs. That's comparable to Adrian Peterson's playing weight of 217 lbs. He's not too light by any measure. Standing next to Mixon, Gordon, Peterson for comparison |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Browka
|
posted: 2017-09-15 06:43:40 (ID: 100114339) Report Abuse |
gnikeoj wrote:
Browka wrote:
But even if his game was not "bad" I am still not convince by Montgomery as an RB. He's too light to pass the DL when he didn't got enough block to go trough so the offense is still too much uneven to not rest on Rodgers performances. (English is too hard for me right now. ) Ty Montgomery is listed at 216 lbs. That's comparable to Adrian Peterson's playing weight of 217 lbs. He's not too light by any measure. Standing next to Mixon, Gordon, Peterson for comparison But... But... He seems so tiny ! |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Cheesehead
|
posted: 2017-09-15 08:16:04 (ID: 100114349) Report Abuse |
Browka wrote:
But... But... He seems so tiny ! My guess is that if he stands next to you he will look like a giant |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 21 22 23 > >| | |
Main / American Football in real life / Green Bay Packers |