no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Don't limit OLB speed by MLB speed Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 5 6 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-06-03 18:47:30 (ID: 100106459) Report Abuse |
|
I didn't quote you so I didn't edit your quote or intend to suggest that you called Pete a liar. Just a statement of fact to look for alternative reasons.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-06-03 19:12:11 (ID: 100106461) Report Abuse |
|
I was referring to when Pete modified my quote early on in this thread to make a dumb comment, and then got pissed when I put it back to what it originally was.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-06-03 19:41:40 (ID: 100106465) Report Abuse | |
|
I was never ever editing your quote. You changed my "question-answer-answer" example so it looked different from what I was writing.
One more times: guys, stop such calls. #locked |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-06-03 19:44:29 (ID: 100106467) Report Abuse | |
|
pete wrote:
Rock777 wrote:
(it is like...) Software Engineer who wrote the stuff wrote:
there is a mistake in your assumption Rock777 wrote:
I doubt I am mistaken 
PS: if you doubt my comments, I cannot help anyway... This whole thing - you edited afterwards, @Rock - was just to show that you doubted answers the guy was providing to you, that wrote the whole staff...it was never meant to really quote you. So I still don't get your take on me... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-06-03 20:17:00 (ID: 100106470) Report Abuse |
|
This was the full sentence.
Rock777 wrote:
I doubt I am mistaken in believing that a player with ALL skills better than another should get more sacks when playing against the same set of team. You took it entirely out of context to fit your answer. I replied back with the full sentence restored, which you labeled a false quote... 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-06-03 20:19:51 (ID: 100106471) Report Abuse | |
|
Maybe it is an wording issue...however, I meant it completey different when I wrote down that "question answer dialogue"...but hey, I have no power left today for anymore pointless arguing.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-06-03 20:23:03 (ID: 100106472) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
@Rock - was just to show that you doubted answers the guy was providing to you, that wrote the whole staff...it was never meant to really quote you. So I still don't get your take on me... With the full quote in context you can see that I never doubted your answer. I doubted that the behavior I am seeing was intended. Which implies something may not be working as expected. This is a large code base. I would be pretty shocked if it didn't include any "features". |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-06-03 20:26:38 (ID: 100106473) Report Abuse | |
|
That was not the point I was trying to make...but as said, game over for today...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
thomastem
|
posted: 2017-06-03 20:36:51 (ID: 100106474) Report Abuse |
|
Pete we all love you. Now turn the frown upside down into a smile!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2017-06-03 22:30:30 (ID: 100106482) Report Abuse |
|
Rock777 wrote:
Wellesley 92 blitzes on 318 rushing plays (29%) 170 blitzes on 287 passing plays (59%) 13 sacks against 287 pass plays (8%) Other team 252 blitzes on 306 rushing plays (82%) 273 blitzes on 313 passing plays (87%) 49 sacks against 313 pass plays (18%) looking at your friendly schedule (and Langdon, Delgado  it was not too hard to find out which team your are talking about, and I compared the 2 QBs you started in those games. yours is significantly slower (and can be sacked by fairly slow LBs), while your opponents is at the top end in terms of QB speed, even hard to sack for a 50 Speed OLB. that would explain your lower sack percentage in head-to-head comparison. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 5 6 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Don't limit OLB speed by MLB speed | |
