no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / SuperCup Season 29 Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 7 8 9 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2018-02-23 22:43:47 (ID: 100124824) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
oakbark wrote:
I think the mechanic where the FB always blocks a man is overpowered. He should not be certain to make a block every time. I think the formations where the HB is in the backfield he should also get a chance to block a lineman breaking through or the Blitzer. If this change was implemented then it would i believe go someway to redress the balance in formations. I believe NFL rl blocking success is quite large. Near 98-99% I think. But yes - every rare now and then a rusher should still get through the block. But our stats are kind of a misnomer. TE's always record successful blocks but on run plays sometimes I see that the blocked defender still makes the tackle - often for no gain or a loss but still shows as a successful block in the stats. Last edited on 2018-02-23 22:49:02 by punch drunk |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2018-02-23 23:38:50 (ID: 100124827) Report Abuse |
|
punch drunk wrote:
Obviously you have never looked at my games - or you would know I do not just use SG4. I use 3 playbooks - my big one is around 1300 lines.. I never said you did. I'd rather defend against 1300 lines than completely RNG. punch drunk wrote:
But as for RZA only simulating formation play - I don't agree that is what is being simulated. We see screens and deep passes and inside and outside etc.. Runs we see all direction stuff. But we can't control or counter any of that. We can only plan at the formation level. So the rest is pretty much flavor. punch drunk wrote:
BUT I do think pete needs to impose/increase a penalty when only a formation is used over 85% of the time. Large enough to guarantee a loss... Here we agree, although I would say it should just continually increase. 85% should be less effective than 50% should be less effective than 25%. Regardless, no one formation should be the default best formation to call in every situation. That is game breaking. We really shouldn't have any formation that are never the right formation to use. The best game play situation is for all formations to have strengths and weaknesses and to have defensive formations with net zero varying degrees of success against runs and passes. Games should be about trade-offs. If there is no trade-off and SG4 is just always the right play to call, then there isn't much of a game. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ProvidenceLA
|
posted: 2018-02-26 22:19:09 (ID: 100124950) Report Abuse |
|
note to self: never attempt a deep pass out of desperation ever again
 GG derby |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
gabriel06
|
posted: 2018-02-27 07:34:30 (ID: 100124960) Report Abuse |
|
ProvidenceLA wrote:
note to self: never attempt a deep pass out of desperation ever again GG derbythat was a killer sack to take you out of FG range and leave you at a 3rd and 17. No real option but to go for it. Nothing in it otherwise. GG  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
passionatelad
|
posted: 2018-04-02 13:21:54 (ID: 100126410) Report Abuse |
|
Berzuchy just got handed lol, no idea where that came from sorry mate.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2018-04-09 20:26:32 (ID: 100126604) Report Abuse | |
|
End of the group stage today....wonder where the 2 loss PD cut-off will be. I think the 2 loss teams in my division probably are moving on @ ~ +600.
Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Schwabe
|
posted: 2018-04-09 21:46:08 (ID: 100126610) Report Abuse |
|
548, will be decided by "Points for"
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hollyhh2000
|
posted: 2018-04-09 22:05:43 (ID: 100126611) Report Abuse |
|
570, if I sorted them correctly...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Fummer
|
posted: 2018-04-09 22:05:51 (ID: 100126612) Report Abuse |
|
Hoping my 592 will be enough. Checked before last round, and i was in the cold by 1 point.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hollyhh2000
|
posted: 2018-04-09 22:07:05 (ID: 100126613) Report Abuse |
|
Fummer wrote:
Hoping my 592 will be enough. Checked before last round, and i was in the cold by 1 point. you are definitely safe |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 7 8 9 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / SuperCup Season 29 | |
