no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Recent news - player progress Search Forum | |||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 6 7 > >| | |||||
Poll: What to do with the training progress calculation during negotiations? (see description in first post),
Poll closed,
votes: 168
|
|||||
| Poster | Message | ||||
|
Mobeer
|
posted: 2018-05-09 19:37:59 (ID: 100128186) Report Abuse | ||||
|
Can't really vote since it's not clear to me what either of these options actually means.
|
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
| posted: 2018-05-09 20:01:47 (ID: 100128188) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |||||
|
Mobeer wrote:
pls have a read a few pages bakwards, it was well explained there by different postersCan't really vote since it's not clear to me what either of these options actually means. Last edited on 2018-05-09 20:02:13 by pete |
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
|
WorpeX
|
posted: 2018-05-10 16:40:52 (ID: 100128254) Report Abuse | ||||
|
Mobeer wrote:
Can't really vote since it's not clear to me what either of these options actually means. Its really confusing. Pete didn't describe it well at all but a few other members in the forum did. I'm afraid the poor explanation - especially for option B - is influencing the vote. I like B personally. I think A will de-value older players too much. I also like having some sort of understanding of how much a player wants to be paid or will be paid in the future. With age now a factor into it, I would get super confused. |
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
| posted: 2018-05-10 17:06:50 (ID: 100128256) Report Abuse | |||||
|
just for the protocol: b would create a much more inaccurate picture...
|
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-05-10 17:11:09 (ID: 100128258) Report Abuse | ||||
|
How would this affect non-HR managers?
If I understand correctly managers using HR will get an extra advantage with this change but I don't think it will have any affect on non-HR managers, did I get this wrong? |
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
| posted: 2018-05-10 19:29:13 (ID: 100128262) Report Abuse | |||||
|
true
|
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-05-10 19:37:30 (ID: 100128263) Report Abuse | ||||
|
That seems a bit unfair to non-HR managers then, especially when keeping things balanced is always one of the first requirements you ask for when we introduce a suggestion.
|
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
| posted: 2018-05-10 20:01:25 (ID: 100128266) Report Abuse | |||||
|
no, it is not unfair, since the period in question for non-hr managers is the current season, and the mentioned effects in the HR department happen because of multi seasonal contract periods
|
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-05-11 08:18:39 (ID: 100128295) Report Abuse | ||||
|
I will respectfully disagree Pete.
Before the change HR-Managers had an advantage of $X over non-HR managers when talking about multi-season contracts. This change will make multi-season contracts even more worth it for HR managers while it is not changing anything for non-HR managers ergo the advantage for HR managers is now greater than what it was before this change. |
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
| posted: 2018-05-11 09:38:57 (ID: 100128308) Report Abuse | |||||
|
And here we stand, two people, disagreeing, arguments exchanged already. No problem
|
|||||
| Quote Reply Edit | |||||
| reply Mark this thread unread | |||||
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 6 7 > >| | |||||
| Main / Discussions / Recent news - player progress | |||||
