Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Suggestions / QB runs ... - DONE Search Forum
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3 4  5  >   >|  
Rating:
Rating
Poster Message
ivo17
posted: 2018-08-08 20:07:48 (ID: 100131621) Report Abuse
Would be a nice adition to the game
Quote   Reply   Edit  
pete
H2TAGIT4Q

Europe   pete owns a supporter account   pete is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-01/S00
Posts: 20506
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-08 20:09:35 (ID: 100131622) Report Abuse
@Ivo: this one, or the initial suggestion?

pete wrote:
Wouldn't it be cool if there was a new formation you could choose, like "I forrmation QB sneak"? If you choose it, the chance would be higher for the QB to go.

This could be done quite easily, I guess
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Buziano
Social Distance Runners

Germany   Buziano owns a supporter account

Joined: 2013-05-07/S08
Posts: 2708
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-08 21:34:00 (ID: 100131629) Report Abuse
I Fornation QB sneak’ Hey, I like it.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
ivo17
posted: 2018-08-08 21:38:01 (ID: 100131630) Report Abuse
pete wrote:
@Ivo: this one, or the initial suggestion?

pete wrote:
Wouldn't it be cool if there was a new formation you could choose, like "I forrmation QB sneak"? If you choose it, the chance would be higher for the QB to go.

This could be done quite easily, I guess


The QB sneak in general. How you do it dont really matter to me. Your idea is ok but add a "qb sneak" option besides run and pass in the playbook is also nice.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
jack6
Leverkusen Leopards

Germany   jack6 owns a supporter account   jack6 is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-05/S00
Posts: 7096
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-09 05:27:32 (ID: 100131638) Report Abuse
For me a sneak is just a fraction of qb run options.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
pete
H2TAGIT4Q

Europe   pete owns a supporter account   pete is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-01/S00
Posts: 20506
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-09 07:20:08 (ID: 100131641) Report Abuse
jack6 wrote:
For me a sneak is just a fraction of qb run options.


Of course. I was searching for a way to trigger the QB running. The direction of the run would be set by the "direction", so we could call the new formation "I formation QB keep"... Erbsenzähler
Quote   Reply   Edit  
jack6
Leverkusen Leopards

Germany   jack6 owns a supporter account   jack6 is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-05/S00
Posts: 7096
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-09 07:24:44 (ID: 100131643) Report Abuse
Yes I might be. But would not add it to the Formation, I would add it to the pass/run Options. So rush is one and QB-rush the second.
In that Change you could also add a FB-rush to enable FB runs on I Formation and so on, where FB was only blocking so far.

Quote   Reply   Edit  
ivo17
posted: 2018-08-09 13:41:44 (ID: 100131656) Report Abuse
jack6 wrote:
Yes I might be. But would not add it to the Formation, I would add it to the pass/run Options. So rush is one and QB-rush the second.
In that Change you could also add a FB-rush to enable FB runs on I Formation and so on, where FB was only blocking so far.




That would be nice
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Jonny Utah
Chelt Nam Bobbers

England   Jonny Utah owns a supporter account

Joined: 2015-02-18/S15
Posts: 1425
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-09 16:46:19 (ID: 100131666)  Edits found: 1 Report Abuse
jack6 wrote:
Yes I might be. But would not add it to the Formation, I would add it to the pass/run Options. So rush is one and QB-rush the second.
In that Change you could also add a FB-rush to enable FB runs on I Formation and so on, where FB was only blocking so far.


Would this not push the balance between FB and RB and thier coaches firmly in favour of the FB?

Last edited on 2018-08-09 16:46:36 by Jonny Utah

Quote   Reply   Edit  
pete
H2TAGIT4Q

Europe   pete owns a supporter account   pete is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-01/S00
Posts: 20506
Top Manager



 
posted: 2018-08-09 16:51:21 (ID: 100131668) Report Abuse
jack6 wrote:
Yes I might be. But would not add it to the Formation, I would add it to the pass/run Options. So rush is one and QB-rush the second.
In that Change you could also add a FB-rush to enable FB runs on I Formation and so on, where FB was only blocking so far.



I dislike this for a certain reason. I just want to prevent people from using QB run all game long. I had something different in mind with the formations. You could set it, but it would on the QB if he runs or decides to handover the ball to RB.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   <   1  2  3 4  5  >   >|  
Main / Suggestions / QB runs ... - DONE