no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Bug reporting / HB/RB Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-10 18:11:53 (ID: 16094) |
|
Bullshit...it was right as it was...I will rollback the change now
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-10 18:12:21 (ID: 16095) |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Admin wrote:
Should be better now What did you changed? I see no difference. post above... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-11-10 18:13:34 (ID: 16096) Report Abuse | |
|
why was it right?
I have a RB and a FB on the roster, but a HB and a FB on the depth chart. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-10 18:21:41 (ID: 16101) |
|
jack6 wrote:
why was it right? I have a RB and a FB on the roster, but a HB and a FB on the depth chart. True... Remember back, when we introduced FBs...all testers said: we should move the FB to his own "position group" since the FB is sooooo different from the other RBs... I did that. So now we have an own positional group called FB, consists of one position, called FB. And we have a group RB, consists of HB, and maybe later TBs as example... From this point of view it is right as it is today. I see only one way to fix it: move FBs back to the group of RBs... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-11-10 18:29:04 (ID: 16103) Report Abuse | |
|
Ok ...
I had a quick look a some NFL rosters and College rosters. NFL: No Groups. All Players are listed on positions. But they still switch players from one to another, most of the time at the offensive line. College: There are groups and positions mixed ... very clever. I understand the benefit of having groups. But TB is not used often anymore ... so why not name the depth chart position RB and reserve the HB for the position which does not exist at the moment, the H-Back, most of the time filled with TE or FB.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-11-10 18:30:45 (ID: 16104) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
So now we have an own positional group called FB, consists of one position, called FB. And we have a group RB, consists of HB, and maybe later TBs as example... From this point of view it is right as it is today. I see only one way to fix it: move FBs back to the group of RBs... I would stay with FB, but change RB to HB. I think you mead Tailback with TB. I think TB is no official position in modern NFL. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-10 18:34:55 (ID: 16105) |
|
Based on definitions I know, each I-formation has its TB...(yes, Tailback). He is the last one on the row, the TAIL.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-11-10 18:38:16 (ID: 16106) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
NFL: No Groups. All Players are listed on positions. But they still switch players from one to another, most of the time at the offensive line. The only Goupe is sometimes DB (Defenseback), which include CB and SF. I had a look at NFL.com. They have RB and FB as positions. So It would right to change HB -> RB in the DC. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-10 18:41:06 (ID: 16109) |
|
I have to be careful here...this change (Buffalos suggestion) affects the whole engine. The position picker needs to be rewritten then
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-11-10 18:48:19 (ID: 16113) Report Abuse | |
|
Admin wrote:
I have to be careful here...this change (Buffalos suggestion) affects the whole engine. The position picker needs to be rewritten then  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Bug reporting / HB/RB | |
