no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Having a Draft more unbalanced Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
ryandinho
|
posted: 2012-02-01 18:01:57 (ID: 26684) Report Abuse |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
I have to agree with Turtle's first post here - there are clearly a dozen or so "A" players, then a lot of "B" players. After that they get a bit "C"rummy. I'd agree with that 100%. There were a few players who I definitely wanted to get, alot of players I was happy to get and then players who were noticably lower than the rest of those available. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
looser
|
posted: 2012-02-01 18:17:04 (ID: 26692) Report Abuse |
|
i have only find 4 player so i like to get
and i have scout all the player  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2012-02-02 02:56:28 (ID: 26787) Report Abuse |
|
looser wrote:
i have only find 4 player so i like to get
and i have scout all the player thats ridiculous... unless your team is the 1994 Cowboys there are more than 4 players on the draft board which are of quality. in terms of balance I think there are too many players of equal stock.. to balance it.. I wish there were less guys of 4 1/2 - 5* quality but more overall draft picks for managers to choose from. I say this because it won't always be economically avaliable to sign these highly talented draft picks once we get near our salary caps. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
looser
|
posted: 2012-02-02 09:14:55 (ID: 26801) Report Abuse |
|
Swordpriest1 wrote:
it is 24 player equal quality i have 4 perfect player in my draft and 20 whit high Physical skill so i can use very well the other are good but i prefer the 24 first looser wrote:
i have only find 4 player so i like to get
and i have scout all the player thats ridiculous... unless your team is the 1994 Cowboys there are more than 4 players on the draft board which are of quality. in terms of balance I think there are too many players of equal stock.. to balance it.. I wish there were less guys of 4 1/2 - 5* quality but more overall draft picks for managers to choose from. I say this because it won't always be economically avaliable to sign these highly talented draft picks once we get near our salary caps. 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-02-02 10:05:44 (ID: 26804) Report Abuse |
|
In my opinion the draftboard is okay. For now nothing must change.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Grzymisław
|
posted: 2012-02-02 11:18:52 (ID: 26811) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
In my opinion the draftboard is okay. For now nothing must change. Totally agree with my big league rival. Only more draft players should go to transfer market instead of wasting somewhere in database. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-02-02 22:40:34 (ID: 26876) Report Abuse |
|
I think with 96 player in a draft the overall should break down like this
over all not talent 5 0-2 4.5 0-5 4.0 5-10 3.5 10-15 3.0 10-20 2.5 15-32 2.0 10-15 Or something to that effect that way draft position really does matter. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2012-02-02 23:11:17 (ID: 26879) Report Abuse |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
I think with 96 player in a draft the overall should break down like this over all not talent 5 0-2 4.5 0-5 4.0 5-10 3.5 10-15 3.0 10-20 2.5 15-32 2.0 10-15 Or something to that effect that way draft position really does matter.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2012-02-02 23:56:18 (ID: 26893) Report Abuse |
|
NYDOGS wrote:
andrew2scott2 wrote:
I think with 96 player in a draft the overall should break down like this over all not talent 5 0-2 4.5 0-5 4.0 5-10 3.5 10-15 3.0 10-20 2.5 15-32 2.0 10-15 Or something to that effect that way draft position really does matter. Well with those numbers there are going to be VERY few top quality guys in the game and i'm not sure thats equal to what it is in real life. I would suggest that the numbers be a little bit higher as every team in the first round should be capable of drafting atleast a 4.0 talent. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2012-02-03 00:27:47 (ID: 26898) Report Abuse |
|
Swordpriest1 wrote:Well with those numbers there are going to be VERY few top quality guys in the game and i'm not sure thats equal to what it is in real life. I would suggest that the numbers be a little bit higher as every team in the first round should be capable of drafting atleast a 4.0 talent.
In terms of internet gaming a good number of high rated players might be nice to have, but in real life the drafted players are not so good in the first 1-2 seasons and nobody can see the real value before the contract. And the real drafted stars are however very few. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Having a Draft more unbalanced | |
