no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Blind Bidding Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2012-02-08 18:40:25 (ID: 27531) Report Abuse |
|
Thinking of the TM I've got a quite "crazy idea" for stopping bid wars and don't force you to be on your screen during the end of the auction...
When bidding on players, you put a blind bid and all we can see is the number and name of bidders. Yu can change it until the end of the auction... Bids are then revealed and the highest win (he doesn't pay his current blind bid but just 1K more than the second bid)... I know it's quite a crazy suggestion that won't please many managers but I find that fun! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-02-08 18:41:26 (ID: 27532) |
|
I don't even understand it
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2012-02-08 18:48:22 (ID: 27533) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
I don't even understand it You just put the amount you're ready to pay for the player without showing it... Each manager does the same and at the end all the amounts are revealed... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-02-08 18:49:47 (ID: 27534) Report Abuse |
|
I understand a one time bid highest would win but no one would know who won till the end of the bid.
I dislike but I do think that the maximum on a bid should be 100% instead of 50% it would make these bid war go a lot quicker that mean the bid can double ever time. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2012-02-08 18:56:43 (ID: 27536) Report Abuse |
|
I wrote this idea some weeks ago.
The only point I don't like is this: NYDOGS wrote:
he doesn't pay his current blind bid but just 1K more than the second bid If you bid 50 millions and win the auction, you should pay 50 millions even the second offerer has bid 20. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-08 19:50:52 (ID: 27542) Report Abuse |
|
panoramix wrote:
If you bid 50 millions and win the auction, you should pay 50 millions even the second offerer has bid 20. I had suggested him the nearly the same - just with one difference: Pay as premium the half of the difference between the second highest and the one you wanted to pay In your example the winner would have to pay 35 Million |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2012-02-08 19:53:33 (ID: 27543) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
panoramix wrote:
If you bid 50 millions and win the auction, you should pay 50 millions even the second offerer has bid 20. I had suggested him the nearly the same - just with one difference: Pay as premium the half of the difference between the second highest and the one you wanted to pay In your example the winner would have to pay 35 Million Just paying 1K mor ethan the 2nd bid would avoid cheating from 2 "friends teams"... That's only why I suggested it |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-08 19:58:15 (ID: 27544) Report Abuse |
|
NYDOGS wrote:
Just paying 1K mor ethan the 2nd bid would avoid cheating from 2 "friends teams"... That's only why I suggested it The idea behind is not bad! On the other hand this would lead to: The richest team has a sure shot - the question is only how much does the second richest have - "a bit boring" |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2012-02-08 20:54:09 (ID: 27555) Report Abuse |
|
NYDOGS wrote:Just paying 1K mor ethan the 2nd bid would avoid cheating from 2 "friends teams"... That's only why I suggested it
I don't agree with you: you'r a rich team and see ten bids for a player, no one of those by rich teams. It' simple for you to bid 50 millions, with your proposal you will pay only a bit over the best (poor) bid. If you want a player, you have to pay what you bid and this is the real trial of such a system. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-02-09 14:00:07 (ID: 27645) Report Abuse |
|
I agree with the original suggestion.
The biggest flaw I am finding with the current suggestion is the max 50% increase. For example, I bid 900k on a player just before I left for work last night, it was the most allowable under the current system. I got home 15-20mins after the deadline, to find he had gone for about 1m less than I would have paid for him, had I been able to be online. And as for the '1k more than the next highest bid', that's ok with me. I doubt it will see any significant price reductions, and will probable result in more stable player valuations. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Blind Bidding | |
