no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / Excess wage on a TM player? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-03-04 08:48:44 (ID: 31225) Report Abuse |
|
I think it serves people right for not using HR personally.
It's a no-brainer, it saves you a HELL of a lot of money! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-04 11:29:32 (ID: 31257) |
|
Monkey wrote:
thats not cool!!! the skill based wage that non HR guys use should be saved and used by non HR managers when they buy players. as it is its a massive advantage to HR players so why have the option of not using it when its pointless  so you think this should change? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sharoth
|
posted: 2012-03-04 12:26:10 (ID: 31262) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Monkey wrote:
thats not cool!!! the skill based wage that non HR guys use should be saved and used by non HR managers when they buy players. as it is its a massive advantage to HR players so why have the option of not using it when its pointless so you think this should change? I think yes it should, or if it doesn´t, the managers with active HR shouldn´t be able to negotiate a new contract until the season rollover. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-03-04 12:30:33 (ID: 31264) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Monkey wrote:
thats not cool!!! the skill based wage that non HR guys use should be saved and used by non HR managers when they buy players. as it is its a massive advantage to HR players so why have the option of not using it when its pointless so you think this should change? No, it shouldn't change. I'm using HR, I think it will save me a lot of money in the medium/long term. However, one of the GREAT aspects of RZA is choice. I absolutely love the number of choices here :- there are hundreds of ways of earning money, and hundreds of ways of spending money (facilities,staff,transfer market,stadium etc etc). If people want to go down the HR route then that's their choice, if they want to stay on the skill-based wage route then again that's their choice. I think that restricting choice is a bad way forward in RZA, that's why I'm against the current discussions on "transfer market restrictions", if people want to spend 40/50 million on a player then good luck to them, I wouldn't want to, but .... and this is the IMPORTANT bit ... I want to have the CHOICE of whether I spend loads on the TM or loads on facilities or loads on Stadium building or just choose to keep the money in the bank  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-04 12:37:31 (ID: 31267) |
|
sh8888 wrote:
Admin wrote:
Monkey wrote:
thats not cool!!! the skill based wage that non HR guys use should be saved and used by non HR managers when they buy players. as it is its a massive advantage to HR players so why have the option of not using it when its pointless so you think this should change? No, it shouldn't change. I'm using HR, I think it will save me a lot of money in the medium/long term. However, one of the GREAT aspects of RZA is choice. I absolutely love the number of choices here :- there are hundreds of ways of earning money, and hundreds of ways of spending money (facilities,staff,transfer market,stadium etc etc). If people want to go down the HR route then that's their choice, if they want to stay on the skill-based wage route then again that's their choice. I think that restricting choice is a bad way forward in RZA, that's why I'm against the current discussions on "transfer market restrictions", if people want to spend 40/50 million on a player then good luck to them, I wouldn't want to, but .... and this is the IMPORTANT bit ... I want to have the CHOICE of whether I spend loads on the TM or loads on facilities or loads on Stadium building or just choose to keep the money in the bank I agree with all the stuff you put in here! The question is: if a HR manager is giving a 10 passing QB a 1 million per week contract, and sells him, should the buying manager - not using the HR - be forced to spend that 1 million until season end or not. Is it a bug or is it just as it is |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Newgate
|
posted: 2012-03-04 12:42:50 (ID: 31271) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
I agree with all the stuff you put in here! The question is: if a HR manager is giving a 10 passing QB a 1 million per week contract, and sells him, should the buying manager - not using the HR - be forced to spend that 1 million until season end or not. Is it a bug or is it just as it is I think no, the not using HR should not be forced to spend the 1 million till the end of the season |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
preachie
|
posted: 2012-03-04 12:46:37 (ID: 31273) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
if a HR manager is giving a 10 passing QB a 1 million per week contract, and sells him, should the buying manager - not using the HR - be forced to spend that 1 million until season end or not. The buying manager shouldn't have to pay 1 million for that player, regardless if he uses HR or not. If not using HR, the player gets the default salary based by skill. If using HR, the player get a default contract til the end of the season also based on the skills. Just my 2 cents  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-04 12:50:50 (ID: 31276) |
|
preachie wrote:
Admin wrote:
if a HR manager is giving a 10 passing QB a 1 million per week contract, and sells him, should the buying manager - not using the HR - be forced to spend that 1 million until season end or not. The buying manager shouldn't have to pay 1 million for that player, regardless if he uses HR or not. If not using HR, the player gets the default salary based by skill. If using HR, the player get a default contract til the end of the season also based on the skills. Just my 2 cents Oh, HR managers can renegotiate after the transfer, so there we donÄt have any problem...it is "just" on non HR managers |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-04 12:51:23 (ID: 31277) |
|
I assume this is the time to test the brand new poll feature...coming soon
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
texat1suf
|
posted: 2012-03-04 12:52:42 (ID: 31278) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
The question is: if a HR manager is giving a 10 passing QB a 1 million per week contract, and sells him, should the buying manager - not using the HR - be forced to spend that 1 million until season end or not. Is it a bug or is it just as it is I should think not... If a player is released or sold in RZA, he becomes a free agent... He would be required to renegotiate with a new team or his salary should revert to skill based assignments if going to a non HR team... This is not a trade by definition and the contract should not carry over... Also, It would also be a shame for the new owner to have to eat a previous owners mistake... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / Excess wage on a TM player? | |
